Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Invariance of domain
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Notes== The conclusion of the theorem can equivalently be formulated as: "<math>f</math> is an [[open map]]". Normally, to check that <math>f</math> is a homeomorphism, one would have to verify that both <math>f</math> and its [[inverse function]] <math>f^{-1}</math> are continuous; the theorem says that if the domain is an {{em|open}} subset of <math>\R^n</math> and the image is also in <math>\R^n,</math> then continuity of <math>f^{-1}</math> is automatic. Furthermore, the theorem says that if two subsets <math>U</math> and <math>V</math> of <math>\R^n</math> are homeomorphic, and <math>U</math> is open, then <math>V</math> must be open as well. (Note that <math>V</math> is open as a subset of <math>\R^n,</math> and not just in the subspace topology. Openness of <math>V</math> in the subspace topology is automatic.) Both of these statements are not at all obvious and are not generally true if one leaves Euclidean space. [[File:A map which is not a homeomorphism onto its image.png|thumb|alt=Not a homeomorphism onto its image|An injective map which is not a homeomorphism onto its image: <math>g : (-1.1, 1) \to \R^2</math> with <math>g(t) = \left(t^2 - 1, t^3 - t\right).</math>]] It is of crucial importance that both [[Domain of a function|domain]] and [[Image of a function|image]] of <math>f</math> are contained in Euclidean space {{em|of the same dimension}}. Consider for instance the map <math>f : (0, 1) \to \R^2</math> defined by <math>f(t) = (t, 0).</math> This map is injective and continuous, the domain is an open subset of <math>\R</math>, but the image is not open in <math>\R^2.</math> A more extreme example is the map <math>g : (-1.1, 1) \to \R^2</math> defined by <math>g(t) = \left(t^2 - 1, t^3 - t\right)</math> because here <math>g</math> is injective and continuous but does not even yield a homeomorphism onto its image. The theorem is also not generally true in infinitely many dimensions. Consider for instance the [[Banach space|Banach]] [[lp space|{{mvar|L<sup>p</sup>}} space]] <math>\ell^{\infty}</math> of all bounded real [[sequence]]s. Define <math>f : \ell^\infty \to \ell^\infty</math> as the shift <math>f\left(x_1, x_2, \ldots\right) = \left(0, x_1, x_2, \ldots\right).</math> Then <math>f</math> is injective and continuous, the domain is open in <math>\ell^{\infty}</math>, but the image is not.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)