Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Jargon
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Specifics== Jargon, also referred to as "technical language", is "the technical terminology or characteristic idiom of a special activity or group".<ref name=m-w>{{cite web |title=Jargon |url=http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/jargon |work=Merriam Webster |publisher=[[Merriam-Webster]] |access-date=29 March 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130405125946/http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/jargon |archive-date=5 April 2013 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Most jargon is ''technical terminology'' (''technical terms''), involving ''terms of art''<ref>{{Cite Merriam-Webster|Term of art}}</ref> or ''industry terms'', with particular meaning within a specific industry. The primary driving forces in the creation of technical jargon are precision, efficiency of communication, and professionalism.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Yasuoka |first=Mika |date=2015-08-01 |title=Collaboration Across Professional Boundaries – The Emergence of Interpretation Drift and the Collective Creation of Project Jargon |url=https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-015-9229-2 |journal=Computer Supported Cooperative Work |language=en |volume=24 |issue=4 |pages=253–276 |doi=10.1007/s10606-015-9229-2 |s2cid=254416615 |issn=1573-7551|url-access=subscription }}</ref> Terms and phrases that are considered jargon have meaningful definitions, and through frequency of use, can become [[wiktionary:catchword|catchwords]].<ref name=":02">{{cite book |last1=Wodak |first1=Ruth |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Y-pFAgAAQBAJ&pg=PR1 |title=Language, Power and Ideology: Studies in political discourse |date=1989 |publisher=John Benjamins Publishing Company |isbn=9789027286055 |pages=1–288 |language=en}}</ref> While jargon allows greater efficiency in communication among those familiar with it, jargon also raises the threshold of comprehensibility for outsiders.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Stucky |first1=Mark |title=Dr. Jargonlove: Or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Technobabble |journal=Intercom |date=2007 |issue=April |pages=44 |url=https://www.cinemaspirit.info/resume/MS_Intercom_Jargonlove_07.pdf }}</ref> This is usually accepted {{citation needed|date=April 2025}} as an unavoidable [[trade-off]] but it may also be used as a means of [[social exclusion]] (reinforcing [[Ingroups and outgroups|ingroup–outgroup]] barriers) or social aspiration (when introduced as a way of demonstrating expertise). Some academics promote the use of jargon-free language, or plain language,<ref name=":3">{{Cite journal |last1=Wen |first1=Ju |last2=Yi |first2=Lan |date=October 2023 |title=Tips for writing plain language summaries of medical journal publications |journal=Learned Publishing |language=en |volume=36 |issue=4 |pages=720–725 |doi=10.1002/leap.1563 |doi-access=free |s2cid=260235923 |issn=0953-1513}}</ref> as an audience may be alienated or confused by the technical terminology, and thus lose track of a speaker or writer's broader and more important arguments.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Ross |first1=Steven |title=Jargon and the Crisis of Readability: Methodology, Language, and the Future of Film History |journal=Cinema Journal |date=2014 |volume=44 |issue=1 |pages=130–133 |jstor=3661180 |doi=10.1353/cj.2004.0052 |s2cid=191592637 }}</ref> Some words with both a technical and a non-technical meaning are referred to as semi-technical vocabulary: for example, Chinh Ngan Nguyen Le and Julia Miller refer to ''colon'' as an [[anatomical terminology|anatomical term]] and also a [[punctuation mark]];<ref>Chinh Ngan Nguyen Le and Julia Miller, [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0889490623000066 A core meaning-based analysis of English semi-technical vocabulary in the medical field], ''English for Specific Purposes'', volume 70, published April 2023, {{doi|10.1016/j.esp.2023.01.006}}, accessed 27 November 2023</ref> and Derek Matravers refers to ''person'' and its plural form ''persons'' as technical language used in [[philosophy]], where their meaning is more specific than "person" and "people" in their everyday use.<ref>Matravers, D., [https://www.open.edu/openlearn/history-the-arts/philosophy/philosophy-the-nature-persons/content-section-1 Introducing the concept of the 'person' and 'persons'], ''[[OpenLearn]]'', section 1 of "Philosophy: the nature of persons", accessed 27 November 2023</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)