Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Junk science
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Definition== Junk science has been defined as: * "science done to establish a preconceived notion—not to test the notion, which is what proper science tries to do, but to establish it regardless of whether or not it would hold up to real testing."<ref name=":2">{{Cite book |last1=Garfinkle |first1=David |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_uy9VFsFvAUC&dq=%22pseudoscience%22+%22junk+science%22&pg=PT263 |title=Three Steps to the Universe: From the Sun to Black Holes to the Mystery of Dark Matter |last2=Garfinkle |first2=Richard |date=2009-05-15 |publisher=University of Chicago Press |isbn=978-0-226-28349-4 |pages=255 |language=en |access-date=2024-01-23 |archive-date=2024-02-07 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240207162722/https://books.google.com/books?id=_uy9VFsFvAUC&dq=%22pseudoscience%22+%22junk+science%22&pg=PT263 |url-status=live }}</ref> * "opinion posing as empirical evidence, or through evidence of questionable warrant, based on inadequate scientific methodology."<ref name=":3">{{Cite book |last1=Lilienfeld |first1=Scott O. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Olk8BAAAQBAJ&pg=PA282 |title=Science and Pseudoscience in Clinical Psychology |last2=Lynn |first2=Steven Jay |last3=Lohr |first3=Jeffrey M. |date=2014-10-17 |publisher=Guilford Publications |isbn=978-1-4625-1759-6 |pages=282 |language=en |access-date=2024-01-23 |archive-date=2024-02-07 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240207162722/https://books.google.com/books?id=Olk8BAAAQBAJ&pg=PA282 |url-status=live }}</ref> * "methodologically sloppy research conducted to advance some extrascientific agenda or to prevail in litigation."<ref name=":4" />
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)