Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Kalam cosmological argument
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Form of the argument== The most prominent form of the Kalam cosmological argument, as defended by William Lane Craig, is expressed in two parts, as an initial [[syllogism]] followed by further philosophical analysis.<ref>[[#CrgBC|Craig and Moreland, 2009]]: 102</ref> === Initial syllogism === The Kalam cosmological argument is a [[deductive argument]]. Therefore, if its [[premises]] are true, the conclusion follows [[logical consequence|necessarily]]. #Everything that begins to exist has a cause. #The universe began to exist. #Therefore, the universe has a cause. === Conceptual analysis of the conclusion === Craig argues that the cause of the universe [[logical entailment|necessarily]] embodies specific properties, in being:<ref name=BCNTPA>[[#CrgBC|Craig and Moreland, 2009]]: 193β194</ref> *Uncaused, otherwise an [[infinite regress]] of causes would arise. *Timeless (therefore changeless), spaceless, immaterial and enormously powerful, in creating [[spacetime]] and its contents ''[[creatio ex nihilo|ex nihilo]]''. *Personal, possessing [[determinism|non-deterministic]] [[agent causation|agency]], in creating the universe from a timeless state (without prior determining conditions). *Singular, per [[Occam's razor]], in the absence of good reasons to believe in the existence of more than one uncaused cause. Based upon this analysis, he appends a further premise and conclusion:<ref name=BCNTPA /> <ol start="4"><li> If the universe has a cause, then an uncaused, personal Creator of the universe exists who ''[[wikt:sans#English|sans]] (without)'' the universe<ref name=CraigGT>[[#CrgTE|Craig, 2001]] Craig establishes this caveat on theological grounds distinct from the argument, postulating that God enters into a [[temporality|temporal]] state at the moment of creation, therefore, no longer embodying the properties of timelessness and changelessness.</ref> is beginningless, changeless, immaterial, timeless, spaceless and enormously powerful.</li> <li> Therefore, an uncaused, personal Creator of the universe exists, who ''sans'' the universe is beginningless, changeless, immaterial, timeless, spaceless and enormously powerful.</li> </ol> Craig notes the [[theology|theological]] implications that follow from the final conclusion of this argument.<ref name="auto">[[#CrgKC|Craig, 2000]]: 149</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)