Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Lagrange multiplier
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Summary and rationale == The basic idea is to convert a constrained problem into a form such that the [[derivative test]] of an unconstrained problem can still be applied. The relationship between the gradient of the function and gradients of the constraints rather naturally leads to a reformulation of the original problem, known as the '''Lagrangian function''' or Lagrangian.<ref>{{cite book |first1=Brian |last1=Beavis |first2=Ian M. |last2=Dobbs |chapter=Static Optimization |title=Optimization and Stability Theory for Economic Analysis |location=New York |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1990 |isbn=0-521-33605-8 |page=40 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=L7HMACFgnXMC&pg=PA40 }}</ref> In the general case, the Lagrangian is defined as <math display="block">\mathcal{L}(x, \lambda) \equiv f(x) + \langle \lambda, g(x)\rangle</math> for functions <math>f, g</math>; the notation <math>\langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle</math> denotes an [[inner product]]. The value <math>\lambda</math> is called the '''Lagrange multiplier'''. In simple cases, where the inner product is defined as the [[dot product]], the Lagrangian is <math display="block">\mathcal{L}(x, \lambda) \equiv f(x) + \lambda\cdot g(x)</math> The method can be summarized as follows: in order to find the maximum or minimum of a function <math>f </math> subject to the equality constraint <math>g(x) = 0</math>, find the [[stationary point]]s of <math>\mathcal{L} </math> considered as a function of <math>x </math> and the Lagrange multiplier <math>\lambda ~</math>. This means that all [[partial derivative]]s should be zero, including the partial derivative with respect to <math>\lambda ~</math>.<ref>{{cite book |first1=Murray H. |last1=Protter |author-link=Murray H. Protter |first2=Charles B. Jr. |last2=Morrey |author-link2=Charles B. Morrey Jr. |year=1985 |title=Intermediate Calculus |place=New York, NY |publisher=Springer |edition=2nd |page=267 |isbn=0-387-96058-9 }}</ref> {{block indent | em = 1.5 | text = <math> \frac{ \partial \mathcal{L} }{\partial x} = 0 </math> {{pad|2em}} and {{pad|2em}} <math> \frac{\ \partial \mathcal{L}\ }{\partial \lambda} = 0\ ;</math>}} or equivalently {{block indent | em = 1.5 | text = <math> \frac{ \partial f(x) }{\partial x} + \lambda\cdot \frac{ \partial g(x) }{\partial x} = 0 </math> {{pad|2em}} and {{pad|2em}}<math> g(x) = 0 ~.</math>}} The solution corresponding to the original [[constrained optimization]] is always a [[saddle point]] of the Lagrangian function,<ref name=Walsh1975>{{cite book |first=G.R. |last=Walsh |year=1975 |title=Methods of Optimization |place=New York, NY |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=0-471-91922-5 |chapter=Saddle-point Property of Lagrangian Function |pages=39–44 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=K0EZAQAAIAAJ&pg=PA39 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |first=Dan |last=Kalman |year=2009 |title=Leveling with Lagrange: An alternate view of constrained optimization |journal=[[Mathematics Magazine]] |volume=82 |issue=3 |pages=186–196 |doi=10.1080/0025570X.2009.11953617 |jstor=27765899 |s2cid=121070192 }}</ref> which can be identified among the stationary points from the [[Definiteness of a matrix|definiteness]] of the [[Bordered Hessian|bordered Hessian matrix]].<ref name=SilberbergSuen>{{cite book |first1=Eugene |last1=Silberberg |first2=Wing |last2=Suen |year=2001 |title=The Structure of Economics: A Mathematical Analysis |location=Boston |publisher=Irwin McGraw-Hill |edition=Third |isbn=0-07-234352-4 |pages=134–141 }}</ref> The great advantage of this method is that it allows the optimization to be solved without explicit [[Parametrization (geometry)|parameterization]] in terms of the constraints. As a result, the method of Lagrange multipliers is widely used to solve challenging constrained optimization problems. Further, the method of Lagrange multipliers is generalized by the [[Karush–Kuhn–Tucker conditions]], which can also take into account inequality constraints of the form <math>h(\mathbf{x}) \leq c </math> for a given constant <math>c </math>.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)