Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Langlands program
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Background== The Langlands program is built on existing ideas: the [[philosophy of cusp forms]] formulated a few years earlier by [[Harish-Chandra]] and {{harvs|txt|authorlink=Israel Gelfand |last=Gelfand|year=1963}}, the work and Harish-Chandra's approach on [[semisimple Lie group]]s, and in technical terms the [[Selberg trace formula|trace formula]] of [[Atle Selberg|Selberg]] and others. What was new in Langlands' work, besides technical depth, was the proposed connection to number theory, together with its rich organisational structure hypothesised (so-called [[functor]]iality). Harish-Chandra's work exploited the principle that what can be done for one [[Semisimple Lie algebra|semisimple]] (or reductive) [[Lie group]], can be done for all. Therefore, once the role of some low-dimensional Lie groups such as GL(2) in the theory of modular forms had been recognised, and with hindsight GL(1) in [[class field theory]], the way was open to speculation about GL(''n'') for general ''n'' > 2. The 'cusp form' idea came out of the cusps on [[modular curves]] but also had a meaning visible in [[spectral theory]] as "[[spectrum (functional analysis)|discrete spectrum]]", contrasted with the "[[spectrum (functional analysis)|continuous spectrum]]" from [[Eisenstein series]]. It becomes much more technical for bigger Lie groups, because the [[Borel subgroup|parabolic subgroups]] are more numerous. In all these approaches technical methods were available, often inductive in nature and based on [[Levi decomposition]]s amongst other matters, but the field remained demanding.<ref>{{cite book|isbn=978-0-465-05074-1|title=Love & Math|first=Edward|last=Frenkel | author-link=Edward Frenkel| date=2013|quote=All this stuff, as my dad put it, is quite heavy: we've got Hitchin moduli spaces, mirror symmetry, ''A''-branes, ''B''-branes, automorphic sheaves... One can get a headache just trying to keep track of them all. Believe me, even among specialists, very few people know the nuts and bolts of all elements of this construction.|url-access=registration|url=https://archive.org/details/lovemathheartofh0000fren}}</ref> From the perspective of modular forms, examples such as [[Hilbert modular form]]s, [[Siegel modular form]]s, and [[theta-function|theta-series]] had been developed.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)