Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Lewis acids and bases
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Depicting adducts== In many cases, the interaction between the Lewis base and Lewis acid in a complex is indicated by an arrow indicating the Lewis base donating electrons toward the Lewis acid using the notation of a [[dative bond]] — for example, {{chem2|Me3B}}←{{chem2|NH3}}. Some sources indicate the Lewis base with a pair of dots (the explicit electrons being donated), which allows consistent representation of the transition from the base itself to the complex with the acid: :{{chem2|Me3B + :NH3 -> Me3B:NH3}} A center dot may also be used to represent a Lewis adduct, such as {{chem2|Me3B*NH3}}. Another example is [[boron trifluoride diethyl etherate]], {{chem2|BF3*Et2O}}. In a slightly different usage, the center dot is also used to represent [[water of crystallization|hydrate coordination]] in various crystals, as in {{chem2|MgSO4*7H2O}} for hydrated [[magnesium sulfate]], irrespective of whether the water forms a dative bond with the metal. Although there have been attempts to use computational and experimental energetic criteria to distinguish dative bonding from non-dative covalent bonds,<ref>{{Cite journal|title=On the Nature of the Dative Bond: Coordination to Metals and Beyond. The Carbon Case|journal=Coordination Chemistry Reviews|volume=308|pages=59–75|doi=10.1016/j.ccr.2015.07.018|year=2016|last1=Lepetit|first1=Christine|last2=Maraval|first2=Valérie|last3=Canac|first3=Yves|last4=Chauvin|first4=Remi}}</ref> for the most part, the distinction merely makes note of the source of the electron pair, and dative bonds, once formed, behave simply as other covalent bonds do, though they typically have considerable polar character. Moreover, in some cases (e.g., sulfoxides and amine oxides as {{chem2|R2S->O}} and {{chem2|R3N->O}}), the use of the dative bond arrow is just a notational convenience for avoiding the drawing of formal charges. In general, however, the donor–acceptor bond is viewed as simply somewhere along a continuum between idealized [[covalent bonding]] and [[ionic bonding]].<ref name="March"/>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)