Editing Loaded language (section)

==Definition==
Loaded terms, also known as emotive or ethical words, were clearly described by [[Charles Stevenson (philosopher)|Charles Stevenson]].{{sfn|Stevenson|1937|}}{{sfn|Stevenson|1944|}}{{sfn|Stevenson|1938|}} He noticed that there are words that do not merely describe a possible state of affairs. "[[wikt:terrorist|Terrorist]]" is not used only to refer to a person who commits specific actions with a specific intent. Words such as "[[wikt:torture|torture]]" or "[[wikt:freedom|freedom]]" carry with them something more than a simple description of a concept or an action.{{sfn|Stevenson|1944|p=210}} They have a "magnetic" effect, an imperative force, a tendency to influence the interlocutor's decisions.{{sfn|Stevenson|1937|pp=18–19}} They are strictly bound to moral values leading to value judgements and potentially triggering specific emotions. For this reason, they have an emotive dimension. In the modern psychological terminology, we can say that these terms carry "emotional valence",{{sfn|Frijda|Mesquita|2000|p=49}} as they presuppose and generate a value judgement that can lead to an emotion.{{sfn|Macagno|Walton|2014|p={{page needed|date=March 2017}} }}

The appeal to emotion is in contrast to an appeal to [[logic]] and [[reason]]. Authors R. Malcolm Murray and Nebojša Kujundžić distinguish "''[[prima facie]]'' reasons" from "considered reasons" when discussing this.  An emotion, elicited via emotive language, may form a ''prima facie'' reason for action, but further work is required before one can obtain a ''considered'' reason.{{sfn|Murray|Kujundzic|2005|p=90}}

Emotive arguments and loaded language are particularly persuasive because they exploit the human weakness for acting immediately based upon an emotional response, ''without'' such further considered judgement.  Due to such potential for emotional complication, it is generally advisable to avoid loaded language in argument or speech when fairness and impartiality is one of the goals.  [[Anthony Weston]], for example, admonishes students and writers: "In general, avoid language whose only function is to sway the emotions".{{sfn|Weston|2000|p=6}}{{sfn|Murray|Kujundzic|2005|p=90}}

One aspect of loaded language is that loaded words and phrases occur in pairs, sometimes as [[political framing]] techniques by individuals with opposing agendas. Heller calls these "a Boo! version and a Hooray! version" to differentiate those with negative and positive emotional connotations. Examples include ''bureaucrat'' versus ''public servant'', ''anti-abortion'' versus ''pro-life'', ''regime'' versus ''government'', and ''elitist'' versus ''expert''.{{sfn|Heller|2002|p=54}}