Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Logical disjunction
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Inclusive and exclusive disjunction== Because the logical ''or'' means a disjunction formula is true when either one or both of its parts are true, it is referred to as an ''inclusive'' disjunction. This is in contrast with an [[exclusive disjunction]], which is true when one or the other of the arguments are true, but not both (referred to as ''exclusive or'', or ''XOR''). When it is necessary to clarify whether inclusive or exclusive ''or'' is intended, English speakers sometimes uses the phrase ''[[and/or]]''. In terms of logic, this phrase is identical to ''or'', but makes the inclusion of both being true explicit.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)