Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Longitudinal study
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Advantages == When longitudinal studies are [[observational study|observational]], in the sense that they observe the state of the world without manipulating it, it has been argued that they may have less power to detect [[causality|causal relationships]] than [[experiment]]s. Others say that because of the repeated observation at the individual level, they have more power than cross-sectional observational studies, by virtue of being able to exclude time-invariant unobserved individual differences and also of observing the temporal order of events.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=van der Krieke |first1=Lian |last2=Blaauw |first2=Frank J. |last3=Emerencia |first3=Ando C. |last4=Schenk |first4=Hendrika M. |last5=Slaets |first5=Joris P.J. |last6=Bos |first6=Elisabeth H. |last7=de Jonge |first7=Peter |last8=Jeronimus |first8=Bertus F. |date=August 2016 |title=Temporal Dynamics of Health and Well-Being: A Crowdsourcing Approach to Momentary Assessments and Automated Generation of Personalized Feedback |journal=[[Psychosomatic Medicine (journal)|Psychosomatic Medicine]] |location=Philadelphia, Pennsylvania |publisher=[[Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]] |volume=79 |issue=2 |pages=213–223 |doi=10.1097/PSY.0000000000000378 |pmid=27551988 |s2cid=10955232|url=https://pure.rug.nl/ws/files/40193705/00006842_201702000_00011.pdf }}</ref>{{Failed verification|date=August 2020|reason=looked at article and can't seem to find this language and not clearly a good source for such information}} Longitudinal studies do not require large numbers of participants (as in the examples below). Qualitative longitudinal studies may include only a handful of participants,<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Wood |first1=Jennifer P. |last2=Connelly |first2=Denise M. |last3=Maly |first3=Monica R. |date=November 2010 |title='Getting back to real living': A qualitative study of the process of community reintegration after stroke |journal=[[Clinical Rehabilitation]] |location=Thousand Oaks, California |publisher=[[SAGE Publications]] |volume=24 |issue=11 |pages=1045–56 |doi=10.1177/0269215510375901 |pmid=20713436 |s2cid=40295472}}</ref> and longitudinal pilot or feasibility studies often have fewer than 100 participants.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Freeman |first1=Joshua R. |last2=Whitcomb |first2=Brian W. |last3=Roy |first3=Amrita |last4=Bertone-Johnson |first4=Elizabeth R. |last5=Reich |first5=Nicholas G. |last6=Healy |first6=Andrew J. |date=August 2018 |title=A pilot longitudinal study of anti-Müllerian hormone levels throughout gestation in low risk pregnancy |journal=Health Science Reports |location=Hoboken, New Jersey |publisher=[[Wiley (publisher)|Wiley]] |volume=1 |issue=8 |pages=e53 |doi=10.1002/hsr2.53 |pmc=6266452 |pmid=30623089}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)