Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Micro Channel architecture
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Background == {{Unreferenced section|date=July 2024}} The development of Micro Channel was driven by both technical and business pressures. === Technology === The [[IBM AT]] bus, which later became known as the [[Industry Standard Architecture]] (ISA) bus, had a number of technical design limitations, including: * A slow bus speed. * A limited number of [[interrupt]]s, fixed in hardware. * A limited number of [[I/O device]] addresses, also fixed in hardware. * Hardwired and complex configuration with no conflict resolution. * Deep links to the architecture of the [[80x86]] chip family<ref group='NB'>Use of the ISA bus outside of machines employing the 80x86 CPU family was rare. Notable non-x86 hardware that used the ISA bus include the [[IBM RT PC]], [[BeBox]], some [[Apollo/Domain]] workstations, and some members of the [[Digital Equipment Corporation|Digital Equipment]] [[AlphaServer]] line.</ref> In addition, it suffered from other problems: * Poor [[Ground (electricity)|grounding]] and power distribution. * Undocumented bus interface standards that varied between systems and manufacturers. These limitations became more serious as the range of tasks and peripherals, and the number of manufacturers for [[IBM PC compatible|IBM PC-compatibles]], grew. IBM was already investigating the use of [[RISC]] processors in desktop machines, and could, in theory, save considerable money if a single well-documented bus could be used across their entire computer lineup. === Market share === It was thought that by creating a new standard, IBM would regain control of standards via the required licensing. As patents can take three years or more to be granted, however, only those relating to ISA could be licensed when Micro Channel was announced. Patents on important Micro Channel features, such as [[Plug and Play]] automatic configuration, were not granted to IBM until after PCI had replaced Micro Channel in the marketplace. The overall reception was tepid and the impact of Micro Channel in the worldwide PC market was minor.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)