Editing Missing square puzzle (section)

==Solution==
[[File:Missing-square-puzzle,showPart.png|thumb|What the "magician presentation" does not show. The angles of the hypotenuses aren't the same: they are not [[Similarity (geometry)#Similar triangles|similar triangles]]. It is fairly trivial to prove that the triangles must be dissimilar for this form of the puzzle to work in the plane.]]
[[File:Paradoja del cuadrado perdido, area.png|thumb|Splitting the thin parallelogram area (yellow) into little parts, and building a single unit square with them]]

The key to the puzzle is the fact that neither of the 13×5 "triangles" is truly a triangle, nor would either truly be 13x5 if it were, because what appears to be the [[hypotenuse]] is bent. In other words, the "hypotenuse" does not maintain a consistent [[slope]], even though it may appear that way to the human eye. 

[[File:Paradoja_del_cuadrado_perdido_10,AB.png|center|520px|There are two distinct and "false hypotenuses" for the total triangle.]]
A true 13×5 triangle cannot be created from the given component parts. The four figures (the yellow, red, blue and green shapes) total 32 units of area. The apparent triangles formed from the figures are 13 units wide and 5 units tall, so it appears that the area should be ''S'' = {{sfrac|13×5|2}} = 32.5 units. However, the blue triangle has a ratio of 5:2 (=2.5), while the red triangle has the ratio 8:3 (≈2.667), so the apparent combined [[hypotenuse]] in each figure is actually bent. With the bent hypotenuse, the first figure actually occupies a combined 32 units, while the second figure occupies 33, including the "missing" square.

The amount of bending is approximately {{sfrac|1|28}} units (1.245364267°), which is difficult to see on the diagram of the puzzle, and was illustrated as a graphic. Note the grid point where the red and blue triangles in the lower image meet (5 squares to the right and two units up from the lower left corner of the combined figure), and compare it to the same point on the other figure; the edge is slightly under the mark in the upper image, but goes through it in the lower. Overlaying the "hypotenuses" from both figures results in a very thin [[parallelogram]] (represented with the four red dots in the above image) with an area of exactly one grid square ([[Pick's theorem]] gives '''0'''<ref>number of interior lattice points</ref> + {{sfrac|'''4'''<ref>number of boundary lattice points</ref>|2}} &minus; 1 = 1), which corresponds to the "missing" area.

===Principle===
[[File:Missing_square_puzzle_simple.svg|thumb|100px|More obvious using Fibonacci ratios 1:2 and 2:3]]
According to [[Martin Gardner]],<ref>
{{cite book 
|last= Gardner
|first= Martin
|title= Mathematics Magic and magic 
|year= 1956 
|publisher= Dover 
|pages= 139–150
|isbn= 9780486203355
}}</ref> this particular puzzle was invented by a [[New York City]] amateur magician, [[Paul Curry]], in 1953. However, the principle of a dissection paradox has been known since the start of the 16th century. 

The integer dimensions of the parts of the puzzle (2, 3, 5, 8, 13) are successive [[Fibonacci numbers]], which leads to the exact unit area in the ''thin parallelogram''.
Many other geometric [[dissection puzzle]]s are based on a few simple properties of the Fibonacci sequence.<ref>{{cite web |publisher=Math World |last=Weisstein |first=Eric |title=Cassini's Identity |url=http://mathworld.wolfram.com/CassinisIdentity.html}}</ref>