Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Musket
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Etymology== According to the Online Etymology Dictionary, firearms were often named after animals, and the word musket derived from the French word {{lang|fr|mousquette}}, which is a male [[Eurasian Sparrowhawk|sparrowhawk]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=musket&allowed_in_frame=0 |title=musket |website=Online Etymology Dictionary |access-date=4 September 2016}}</ref> An alternative theory is that derives from the 16th-century French {{lang|fr|mousquet, -ette}}, from the Italian {{lang|it|moschetti, -etta}}, meaning the bolt of a [[crossbow]]. The Italian {{lang|it|moschetti}} is a diminutive of {{lang|it|mosca}}, a fly.<ref>''The Concise Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology'', T. F. Hoed, Oxford University Press, 1888 ({{ISBN|0-19-283098-8}}) p. 305.</ref> ===Terminology=== The first recorded usage of the term "musket" or {{lang|it|moschetti}} appeared in Europe in the year 1499.{{sfn|Phillips|2016}} Evidence of the musket as a type of firearm does not appear until 1521 when it was used to describe an [[arquebus]] that was so heavy that it needed to be rested on a forked stick. Such muskets were used to kill heavily armored targets. This version of the musket fell out of use after the mid-16th century with the decline of heavy armour;{{sfn|Needham|1986|p=428}} however, the term itself stuck around as a general descriptor for "shoulder arms" fire weapons into the 19th century. The differences between the arquebus and musket post-16th century are therefore not entirely clear, and the two have been used interchangeably on several occasions.{{sfn|Chase|2003|p=61}}{{sfn|Little|2010|p=39}} According to historian David A. Parrot, the concept of the musket as a legitimate innovation is uncertain and may consist of nothing more than a name change.{{sfn|Rogers|1995|p=247}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)