Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Natural experiment
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==History== [[File:Snow-cholera-map-1.jpg|thumb|right|220px|[[John Snow (physician)|John Snow]]'s map showing the clustering of [[cholera]] cases in [[Soho]] during the London epidemic of 1854]] One of the best-known early natural experiments was the [[1854 Broad Street cholera outbreak]] in [[London]], England. On 31 August 1854, a major outbreak of [[cholera]] struck [[Soho]]. Over the next three days, 127 people near Broad Street died. By the end of the outbreak 616 people died. The physician [[John Snow (physician)|John Snow]] identified the source of the outbreak as the nearest public water pump, using a map of deaths and illness that revealed a [[cluster (epidemiology)|cluster]] of cases around the pump.<ref>MacMahon B, Pugh TF. ''Epidemiologic Methods'' (Little, Brown; 1960); reissued as ''Epidemiology: Principles and Methods'' (Little, Brown; 1970) ({{ISBN|0316542598}})</ref> In this example, Snow discovered a strong association between the use of the water from the pump, and deaths and illnesses due to cholera. Snow found that the [[Southwark and Vauxhall Waterworks Company]], which supplied water to districts with high attack rates, obtained the water from the [[River Thames|Thames]] downstream from where raw [[sewage]] was discharged into the river. By contrast, districts that were supplied water by the [[Lambeth Waterworks Company]], which obtained water upstream from the points of sewage discharge, had low attack rates. Given the near-haphazard patchwork development of the water supply in mid-nineteenth century London, Snow viewed the developments as "an experiment...on the grandest scale."<ref>Snow, J. (1855). ''On the Mode of Communication of Cholera'' (2nd ed.). London: Churchill. Excerpted in MacMahon, B. & Pugh, T.F. (1970). ''Epidemiology''. Boston: Little Brown.</ref> Of course, the exposure to the polluted water was not under the control of any scientist. Therefore, this exposure has been recognized as being a natural experiment.<ref>The 1854 cholera outbreak is the example of a natural experiment discussed often by [[David A. Freedman]], e.g. in ''Statistical Models: Theory and Practice'' (Cambridge University Press) [http://www.cambridge.org/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=9780521671057], chapter 1.3 (pp. 6β9).</ref><ref>MacMahon, B., & Pugh, T.F. (1970). ''Epidemiology: Principles and Methods.'' Boston: Little, Brown.</ref><ref>Snow's studies of the pattern of the disease were convincing enough to persuade the local council to disable the well pump by ''removing its handle''. After the handle of the well-pump was replaced, the incidence of new cases dropped. In stopping the use of water from the well-pump, the authorities conducted, in effect, a second study, an uncontrolled intervention study, a study with an intervention group but no control group.</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)