Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Negative and positive atheism
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Scope of application== Because of flexibility in the term [[god (word)|''god'']], it is possible that a person could be a positive/strong atheist in terms of certain [[conceptions of God]], while remaining a negative/weak atheist in terms of others. For example, the God of [[classical theism]] is often considered to be a personal supreme being who is [[omnipotent]], [[omniscient]], [[omnipresent]], and [[omnibenevolent]], caring about humans and human affairs. One might be a positive atheist for such a deity, while being a negative atheist with respect to a [[deism|deistic]] conception of God by rejecting belief in such a deity but not explicitly asserting it to be false. Positive and negative atheism are frequently used by the philosopher [[George H. Smith]] as synonyms of the less-well-known categories of [[implicit and explicit atheism]], also relating to whether an individual holds a specific view that gods do not exist.<ref name="Smith1"/> "''Positive''" atheists explicitly assert that it is false that any deities exist. "''Negative''" atheists assert they do not believe any deities exist, but do not necessarily explicitly assert it is ''true'' that no deity exists. Those who do not believe any deities exist, but do not assert such non-belief, are included among ''implicit atheists''. Among "implicit" atheists are thus included the following: children and adults who have never heard of deities; people who have heard of deities but have never given the idea any considerable thought; and those agnostics who suspend belief about deities, but do not reject such belief. All ''implicit'' atheists are included in the ''negative/weak'' categorization.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20000831235652/http://www.positiveatheism.org/writ/smith.htm The Case Against God - en excerpt]; George H. Smith; 2003</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.thoughtco.com/definition-of-negative-atheism-247866|title=Are You a Negative Atheist?}}</ref> Under the negative atheism classification, agnostics are atheists. The validity of this categorization is disputed, however, and a few prominent atheists such as [[Richard Dawkins]] avoid it. In ''[[The God Delusion]]'', Dawkins describes people for whom the [[Spectrum of theistic probability|probability of the existence of God]] is between "very high" and "very low" as "agnostic" and reserves the term "strong atheist" for those who claim to know there is no God. He categorizes himself as a "[[de facto]] atheist" but ''not'' a "strong atheist" on this scale.<ref>[[The God Delusion]], pp. 50β51</ref> Within negative atheism, philosopher [[Anthony Kenny]] further distinguishes between [[Agnosticism|agnostics]], who find the claim "God exists" uncertain, and [[Theological noncognitivism|theological noncognitivists]], who consider all talk of gods to be meaningless.<ref>{{cite journal |first=Anthony |last=Kenny |author-link=Anthony Kenny |year=2006 |title=Worshipping an Unknown God |journal=Ratio |volume=19 |issue=4 |pages=442 |doi=10.1111/j.1467-9329.2006.00339.x }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)