Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Net protein utilization
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Rating== It is used to determine the nutritional efficiency of protein in the diet,<ref name=EFSA2012>{{cite journal |title=Scientific Opinion on Dietary Reference Values for protein: Dietary Reference Values for protein |journal=EFSA Journal |date=February 2012 |volume=10 |issue=2 |pages=2557 |doi=10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2557|s2cid=139100064 |hdl=2434/257730 |hdl-access=free }}</ref>{{rp|p=11}} that is, it is used as a measure of "protein quality" for human nutritional purposes.<ref>[https://labdoor.com/article/protein-quality-the-4-most-important-metrics Protein Quality–The 4 Most Important Metrics]</ref> As a value, NPU can range from 0 to 1 (or 100), with a value of 1 (or 100) indicating 100% utilization of dietary nitrogen as protein and a value of 0 an indication that none of the nitrogen supplied was converted to protein. Certain foodstuffs, such as [[egg (food)|egg]]s or [[milk]], rate as 1 on an NPU chart. Experimentally, this value can be determined by determining [[diet (nutrition)|diet]]ary protein intake and then measuring nitrogen [[excretion]]. One formula for apparent NPU is:<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Blackburn |first1=GL |last2=Bistrian |first2=BR |last3=Maini |first3=BS |last4=Schlamm |first4=HT |last5=Smith |first5=MF |title=Nutritional and metabolic assessment of the hospitalized patient |journal=Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition |date=1977 |volume=1 |issue=1 |pages=11–22 |doi=10.1177/014860717700100101 |pmid=98649}}</ref> :NPU = {0.16 × (24 hour protein intake in grams)} - {(24 hour urinary [[urea]] nitrogen) + 2} - {0.1 × ([[ideal body weight]] in kilograms)} / {0.16 × (24 hour protein intake in grams)} NPU and [[biological value]] (BV) both measure nitrogen retention; the difference is that biological value is calculated from nitrogen absorbed, whereas net protein utilization is from nitrogen ingested.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Hoffman |first1=JR |last2=Falvo |first2=MJ |title=Protein - Which is Best? |journal=Journal of Sports Science & Medicine |date=September 2004 |volume=3 |issue=3 |pages=118–30 |pmid=24482589|pmc=3905294 }}</ref> Another closely related quantity is the net postprandial protein utilization (NPPU), which is the maximum potential NPU of a dietary protein source under ideal conditions.<ref name=EFSA2012 />{{rp|p=12}} The [[Protein Digestibility Corrected Amino Acid Score]] (PDCAAS) is a more modern rating for determining protein quality, and the current ranking standard used by the FDA. The [[Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score]] (DIAAS) is a [[protein quality]] method, proposed in March 2013 by the [[Food and Agriculture Organization]]<ref>{{Cite web|date=2017-05-19|title=FAO proposes new protein quality measurement - IFT.org|url=http://www.ift.org/food-technology/daily-news/2013/march/07/fao-proposes-new-protein-quality-measurement.aspx|access-date=2020-11-03|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170519171831/http://www.ift.org/food-technology/daily-news/2013/march/07/fao-proposes-new-protein-quality-measurement.aspx|archive-date=2017-05-19}}</ref> to replace the current protein ranking standard, the Protein Digestibility Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS). The proposition is contested, however, due to lack of data.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Potential impact of the digestible indispensable amino acid score as a measure of protein quality on dietary regulations and health|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323757610|access-date=2020-11-03|website=ResearchGate|language=en}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)