Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Numerus clausus
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Historical examples == {{Further|Jewish quota}} === Germany === A whole series of ''numerus clausus'' resolutions were adopted in 1929 on the grounds of race, place of origin, or religion.<ref>JTA Bulletin (1931-3-17), [http://pdfs.jta.org/1931/1931-03-17_064.pdf Berlin: The growing ''numerus clausus'' peril in Germany.] Page 4.</ref> On 25 April 1933, the [[Nazi]] government introduced a 1.5 percent quota for new admissions of German non-Aryans, essentially of German Jews enrolling to German high-schools and universities.<ref>[http://alex.onb.ac.at/cgi-content/anno-plus?apm=0&aid=dra&datum=19330004&zoom=2&seite=00000225&ues=0&x=9&y=13 Gesetz gegen die Überfüllung deutscher Schulen und Hochschulen (RGBl 1933 I, S. 225)] (original German text of the ''Law against the Overcrowding of German Schools and Universities'', introduced in 1933). [http://alex.onb.ac.at/cgi-content/anno-plus?apm=0&aid=dra&datum=19330004&seite=00000226&zoom=2 Erste Verordnung zur Durchführung des Gesetzes gegen die Überfüllung deutscher Schulen und Hochschulen (RGBl 1933 I, S. 226)] (original German text of the ''First Regulation for the Implementation of the Law against the Overcrowding of German Schools and Universities'', introduced in 1933).</ref> === Hungary === The Hungarian ''numerus clausus'' was introduced in 1920. The law formally placed limits on the number of minority students at universities and legalized corporal punishment. Though the text did not use the term ''Jew'', it was nearly the only group overrepresented in higher education. The policy is often seen as the first anti-Jewish act of twentieth century Europe.<ref>Péter Tibor Nagy, [http://mek.oszk.hu/03700/03797/03797.htm#7 The "numerus clausus" policy of antisemitism or policy of higher education], in ''The social and political history of Hungarian education''</ref> Its aim was to restrict the number of Jews to 6 percent, which was their proportion in Hungary at that time; the rate of Jewish students was approximately 15% in the 1910s.<ref name="ReferenceA">Miklos Molnar, ''A Concise History of Hungary'', CUP, 2001</ref> In 1928 – also because of the pressure of liberal capital and League of Nations – the act was modified and the passage of the ethnicity quota had been eliminated.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://regi.sofar.hu/hu/node/13270 |title=A Numerus Clausus módosítása - The modification of the Numerus Clausus law |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |website=regi.sofar.hu}}</ref> In the period of 1938–1945 the anti-Jewish acts were revitalised and eventually much worsened, partly due to [[German Nazi]] pressure, and in hope of revising the [[Treaty of Trianon]] with the help of Germany.<ref name="ReferenceA"/> === Poland === {{See also|Ghetto benches}} Polish universities were a hotbed of the radical far-right [[National Democracy (Poland)|National Democracy]] and from Poland's independence in 1918 right-wing students promoted the return of the Russian ''numerus clausus'' system. Attempts by the [[University of Lviv|University of Lwów]] to implement ''numerus clausus'' in 1922-3 were ruled unconstitutional. In the early 1930s, [[Camp of Great Poland]] advocated ''numerus nullus'' - a complete exclusion of Jews. In 1931, the [[All-Polish Youth]] demonstrated against Jewish medical students operating on Christian cadavers. The medical faculties caved in, and Jewish students were supplied with Jewish cadavers. Polish radicals then demanded segregation of Jewish students, first asking for "voluntary" segregation and when this was refused attacking Jewish students. Following violent demonstrations by Polish radicals, in 1937-8 most Polish universities introduced segregation. By 1939, most Polish institutes of higher learning implemented a ''numerus clausus'' system.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=Tdn6FFZklkcC&dq=%22Numerus+clausus%22+Poland&pg=PA275 Antisemitism: A Historical Encyclopedia of Prejudice and Persecution, Volume 1], Richard S. Levy, ACB CLIO, page 275</ref><ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=t6h2pI7o_zQC&dq=%22Numerus+clausus%22+Poland&pg=PA112 Poland's Threatening Other: The Image of the Jew from 1880 to the Present], University of Nebraska Press, Joanna B. Michlic, page 112-113</ref> === USSR === {{See also|Antisemitism in Soviet mathematics}} Certain scientific and educational institutions in the USSR, such as the [[MSU Faculty of Mechanics and Mathematics]] implemented anti-Jewish restrictions in the second half of the XX century under the guise of ''numerus clausus''. Officially claimed to help promote enrollment of applicants belonging to ethnic minorities underrepresented in Soviet science, such as [[Yakuts]], this policy was effectively used to discriminate Jewish applicants.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Лукьянова |first=Юлия |title=Возведенный в степень. Портрет Виктора Садовничего, математика, который не просчитался. |url=https://www.proekt.media/portrait/viktor-sadovnichyi/}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Shen |first=Alexander |title=Entrance Examinations to the Mekh-mat |url=http://3038.org/press/shen.pdf}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Szpiro |first=George |title=Bella Abramovna Subbotovskaya and the "Jewish People's University" |url=http://www.ams.org/notices/200710/200710-full-issue.pdf |journal=Notices of the American Mathematical Society |volume=54 |issue=10 |pages=1326}}</ref> According to [[Edward Frenkel]],<ref>{{Cite book |last=Frenkel |first=Edward |url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/849801108 |title=Love and math : the heart of hidden reality |date=2013 |isbn=978-0-465-05074-1 |location=New York |oclc=849801108}}</ref> this led to a creation of a strong mathematical community in the advanced mathematics department of [[Gubkin Russian State University of Oil and Gas]], which as a consequence was composed to a significant degree of Jewish students denied entry to the Moscow State University. === North America === Between 1918 and the 1950s a number of private universities and medical schools in the United States introduced ''numerus clausus'' policies limiting admissions of students based on their religion or race to certain percentages within the college population. Many minority groups were negatively impacted by these policies; one of the groups affected was [[Jewish]] applicants, whose admission to some [[New England]]- and New York City-area [[liberal arts college]]s fell significantly between the late 1910s and the mid-1930s.<ref name=Gladwell>[http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2005/10/10/051010crat_atlarge Getting In: the social logic of Ivy League admissions] by [[Malcolm Gladwell]], [[The New Yorker]], 10 October 2005</ref>{{Better source needed|reason=needs a better or at aleast additional sources beyond one popular press book|date=July 2023}} For instance, the admission to [[Harvard University]] during that period fell from 27.6% to 17.1% and in [[Columbia University]] from 32.7% to 14.6%. Corresponding quotas were introduced in the medical and dental schools resulting during the 1930s in the decline of Jewish students: e.g. in [[Cornell University]] School of Medicine from 40% in 1918–22 to 3.57% in 1940–41, in [[Boston University]] Medical School from 48.4% in 1929–30 to 12.5% in 1934–35. At [[Yale University]], Dean Milton Winternitz's instructions to the admissions office regarding ethnic quotas were very specific: "Never admit more than five Jews, take only two [[Italian-American|Italian]] [[Catholic]]s, and take no [[African-American|blacks]] at all."<ref>{{cite book|author=Gerard N. Burrow|title=A History of Yale's School of Medicine: Passing Torches to Others|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XzYX_MduAG8C&pg=PA107|year=2008|publisher=Yale University Press|page=107ff|isbn=978-0300132885}}</ref> During this period, a notable exception among U. S. medical schools was the medical school of [[Middlesex University (Massachusetts)|Middlesex University]], which had no quotas and many Jewish faculty members and students; school officials believed that antisemitism played a role in the school's failure to secure [[American Medical Association|AMA]] [[educational accreditation|accreditation]].<ref name=reisfounding>{{cite web |author = Reis, Arthur H. Jr| title=The Founding | work=Brandeis Review, fiftieth Anniversary Edition | url=http://www.brandeis.edu/publications/review/50threview/founding.pdf | access-date=2006-05-17}}, pp. 42–3: founder's son C. Ruggles Smith quoted: "From its inception, Middlesex was ruthlessly attacked by the American Medical Association, which at that time was dedicated to restricting the production of physicians, and to maintaining an inflexible policy of discrimination in the admission of medical students. Middlesex, alone among medical schools, selected its students on the basis of merit, and refused to establish any racial quotas"</ref> The most common method, employed by 90% of American universities and colleges at the time to identify the "desirable" (native-born, white, Protestant) applicants, was the application form questions about their religious preference, race, and nationality. Other more subtle methods included restrictions on scholarships, rejection of transfer students, and preferences for alumni sons and daughters.{{citation needed|date=March 2016}} [[Legacy preference]] for university admissions was devised in 1925 at [[Yale University]], where the proportional number of Jews in the student body was growing at a rate that became alarming to the school's administrators.<ref name=Gladwell/> Prior to that year, Yale had begun to incorporate such amorphous criteria as 'character' and 'solidity', as well as 'physical characteristics', into its admissions process as an excuse for screening out Jewish students;<ref name=Gladwell/> but nothing was as effective as legacy preference, which allowed the admissions board to summarily pass over Jews in favor of 'Yale sons of good character and reasonably good record', as a 1929 memo phrased it. Other schools, including [[Harvard]], soon began to pursue similar policies for similar reasons, and Jewish students in the [[Ivy League]] schools were maintained at a steady 10% through the 1950s. Such policies were gradually discarded during the early 1960s, with Yale being one of the last of the major schools to eliminate the last vestige with the class of 1970 (entering in 1966).<ref>''[http://www.yalealumnimagazine.com/issues/99_12/admissions.html The Birth of a New Institution] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100314164351/http://www.yalealumnimagazine.com/issues/99_12/admissions.html |date=2010-03-14 }}'' Geoffrey Kabaservice, ''Yale Alumni Magazine'', December 1999</ref> While legacy admissions as a way of screening out Jewish students may have ceased, the practice of giving preference to legacies has continued to the present day. In the 1998 book ''The Shape of the River: Long-Term Consequences of Considering Race in College and University Admissions'', authors William G. Bowen, former Princeton University president, and [[Derek Bok]], former Harvard University president, found "the overall admission rate for legacies was almost twice that for all other candidates". The religion preference question was eventually dropped from the admission application forms and noticeable evidence of informal ''numerus clausus'' policies in the American private universities and medical schools decreased by the 1950s.{{citation needed|date=March 2016}} Certain Canadian universities had longstanding quotas on the number of Jews admitted to the respective universities. [[McGill University]]'s strict quota was the longest, being officially adopted in 1920 up until the late 1960s.<ref>Gerald Tulchinsky, ''Canada's Jews: A People's Journey'', Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008, pp. 132-133, 319-321, 410.</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)