Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Open gaming
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== History == The use of the term open gaming began with the publication of the original SRD and the simultaneous release of the Open Game License (OGL). However, role-playing games had been licensed under open and free content licenses before this.<ref name="Dancey"/> === The Fudge Legal Notice === The [[Fudge (role-playing game system)|Fudge]] [[role-playing game system]] was created in 1992 by [[Steffan O'Sullivan]] with extensive help from the rec.games.design community. The name stood for "Freeform Universal Donated [[Game engine|Game Engine]]" until Steffan O'Sullivan changed 'donated' to 'DIY' in 1995. One reason why Fudge succeeded is that the author released it under the "FUDGE Legal Notice", a license that removed most restrictions on non-commercial use. However the FUDGE Legal Notice (more commonly known as simply "the Fudge license") was never intended to cover any work other than its [[eponymous]] role-playing game. Derivative works which were to be distributed for a fee required written permission from Fudge's author, Steffan O'Sullivan. The details of the Fudge Legal Notice were modified and expanded from time to time as O'Sullivan updated his work, but the essential elements of the license remained unchanged. The 1993 FUDGE Legal Notice allowed reprinting of the Fudge rules, including in otherwise commercial works, as long as certain conditions were met. The 1995 FUDGE Legal Notice permitted the creation of derivative works for personal use and for publication in periodicals. In March 2004, [[Grey Ghost Games]] acquired the copyright of Fudge, and on April 6, 2005, they released a version of Fudge under the [[Open Game License]], making it open for commercial use. === Dominion Rules and Circe === The phrase "opensource roleplaying" was used as early as 1999 by the [[Dominion Rules]] role-playing system, the license of which permitted supplementary material to be written for its rules. Another "open" system was the Circe role-playing system, published by the [[WorldForge]] project under the [[GNU Free Documentation License]] (GFDL). Gods & Monsters, created by Jerry Stratton, was also distributed under GFDL in 2013.<ref>[https://www.godsmonsters.com/Game/Rules/4/ Gods & Monsters] - official website.</ref> === Open Game License === {{main|Open Game License}} Despite Fudge and other games, the open gaming movement did not gain widespread recognition within the role-playing game industry until 2000, when [[Wizards of the Coast]] (WotC) published portions of the 3rd Edition of ''[[Dungeons & Dragons]]'' as the [[System Reference Document]] under the Open Game License. This move was driven by [[Ryan Dancey]] then Brand Manager for WotC, who drafted the Open Game License and first coined the term "open gaming" with respect to role-playing games. ==== Open Gaming Foundation ==== The Open Gaming Foundation (OGF) was founded by Ryan Dancey as an independent forum for discussion of open gaming among the members of the fledgling open gaming movement. The OGF consisted of a web site and a series of mailing lists, including the ''OGF-L'' list (for general discussion of open gaming licensing issues) and the ''OGF-d20-L'' list (for discussion of d20-specific issues). The most common criticism of the OGF was that it was primarily a venue for publicizing Wizards of the Coast. Ryan Dancey was an employee of WotC, and discussion on the mailing lists tended to focus on d20 and the OGL (both owned by WotC) rather than on open gaming in general. The OGF maintained a definition of an "open game license" while it was active, with two criteria: # The license must allow game rules and materials that use game rules to be freely copied, modified and distributed. # The license must ensure that material distributed using the license cannot have those permissions restricted in the future.<ref name="licenses">{{Cite web|url=http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/licenses.html|title = Open Game Licenses}}</ref> The Foundation explicitly stated that the first condition excludes licences that ban commercial use. The second requirement is intended to ensure that the rights granted by the licence are inalienable.<ref name="licenses"/> ==== Reaction ==== The OGL gained immediate popularity with commercial role-playing game publishers. However, the OGL was criticized (primarily by independent role-playing game developers) for being insufficiently "open", and for being controlled by the market leader Wizards of the Coast. In response to this, and in an attempt to shift support away from the OGL and toward more open licenses, several alternatives to the OGL were suggested and drafted. Similarly, the popularity of the OGL inspired others to create their own, specific open content licenses. Virtually none of these gained acceptance beyond the works of the licenses' own authors, and many have since been abandoned. === Open RPG Creative License === Linda Codega, for ''[[Io9]]'' in January 2023, reported on the details from a leaked full copy of an update to the OGL including updated terms such as no longer authorizing use of the OGL1.0.<ref name=":21">{{Cite web |last=Codega |first=Linda |date=January 5, 2023 |title=Dungeons & Dragons' New License Tightens Its Grip on Competition |url=https://gizmodo.com/dnd-wizards-of-the-coast-ogl-1-1-open-gaming-license-1849950634 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230111115214/https://gizmodo.com/dnd-wizards-of-the-coast-ogl-1-1-open-gaming-license-1849950634 |archive-date=2023-01-11 |access-date=January 12, 2023 |website=[[Gizmodo]] |language=en}}</ref> Codega highlighted that "if the original license is in fact no longer viable, every single licensed publisher will be affected by the new agreement. [...] The main takeaway from the leaked OGL 1.1 draft document is that WotC is keeping power close at hand".<ref name=":21" /> Following this, [[Paizo]] announced a new Open RPG Creative License (ORC) as a direct response to the reported changes to the OGL. Additional publishers, such as [[Kobold Press]], [[Chaosium]], [[Green Ronin Publishing|Green Ronin]], Legendary Games, and Rogue Genius Games, will be part of the ORC development process.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |date=January 12, 2023 |title=Paizo Announces Its Own Gaming License Amid D&D OGL Controversy |url=https://gizmodo.com/paizo-wizards-of-the-coast-dnd-open-rpg-ogl-1-1-1849982443 |access-date=January 13, 2023 |website=Gizmodo |language=en}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{Cite web |date=January 12, 2023 |title=Paizo Addresses Pathfinder's Future, Announces New System-Neutral Open RPG License |url=https://comicbook.com/gaming/news/paizo-addresses-pathfinders-future-announces-new-system-neutral-open-rpg-license/ |access-date=January 13, 2023 |website=[[ComicBook.com]] |language=en}}</ref> The ORC will be an open, perpetual, and irrevocable system-agnostic license<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" /> with legal development paid for by Paizo "under the legal guidance of Azora Law", however, the license "will not be owned by Paizo, nor will it be owned by any company who makes money publishing RPGs".<ref name=":2">{{Cite web |date=January 12, 2023 |title=Paizo Announces System-Neutral Open RPG License |url=https://paizo.com/community/blog/v5748dyo6si7v?Paizo-Announces-SystemNeutral-Open-RPG-License |access-date=January 12, 2023 |website=Paizo |type=[[Press release]]}}</ref> Paizo plans to find a "nonprofit with a history of open source values to own this license" and stated that "Azora Law's ownership of the process and stewardship should provide a safe harbor against any company being bought, sold, or changing management in the future and attempting to rescind rights or nullify sections of the license".<ref name=":2" /><ref>{{cite web |title=ORC License Final |url=https://azoralaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/ORC-License.FINAL_.pdf}}</ref> The ORC was released in July 2023.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.pcgamer.com/the-creators-of-pathfinder-have-released-their-own-version-of-dandds-controversial-ogland-it-could-have-a-huge-impact-on-all-tabletop-rpgs/ | title=The creators of Pathfinder have released their own version of D&D's controversial OGLโand it could have a huge impact on all tabletop RPGs | first=Robin | last=Valentine | date=July 5, 2023 | accessdate=July 16, 2023 | work=[[PC Gamer]] }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=ORC License |publisher=Azora Law |url=https://azoralaw.com/orclicense/}}</ref> === Free League Publishing's licenses === [[Free League Publishing]] announced two licenses, for its Year Zero game system and another for its upcoming fantasy RPG ''Dragonbane''.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Free League Publishing Announces Plans to Make Year Zero Open Gaming License After Dungeons & Dragons OGL Controversy |url=https://comicbook.com/gaming/news/free-league-publishing-ogl-year-zero-dragonbane-dungeons-dragons/ |access-date=2023-01-19 |website=GAMING |language=en}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)