Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Orbit
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==History== [[File:Planisphaerium Ptolemaicum siue machina orbium mundi ex hypothesi Ptolemaica in plano disposita (2709983277).jpg|thumb|alt=Andreas Cellarius, a Dutch mathematician and geographer in the 17th century, compiled a celestial atlas with theories from astronomers like Ptolemy and Copernicus. This illustration shows the Earth at the center, with the Moon and planets orbiting around it, based on Ptolemy's geocentric model before Copernicus' heliocentric model.|The Earth-centered universe according to Ptolemy, illustration by Andreas Cellarius from Harmonia Macrocosmica, 1660]] Historically, the apparent motions of the planets were described by European and Arabic philosophers using the idea of [[celestial spheres]]. This model posited the existence of perfect moving spheres or rings to which the stars and planets were attached. It assumed the heavens were fixed apart from the motion of the spheres and was developed without any understanding of gravity. After the planets' motions were more accurately measured, theoretical mechanisms such as [[deferent and epicycle]]s were added. Although the model was capable of reasonably accurately predicting the planets' positions in the sky, more and more epicycles were required as the measurements became more accurate, hence the model became increasingly unwieldy. Originally [[geocentric model|geocentric]], it was modified by [[Copernicus]] to place the Sun at the centre to help simplify the model. The model was further challenged during the 16th century, as comets were observed traversing the spheres.<ref>''Encyclopædia Britannica'', 1968, vol. 2, p. 645</ref><ref>M Caspar, ''Kepler'' (1959, Abelard-Schuman), at pp.131–140; A Koyré, ''The Astronomical Revolution: Copernicus, Kepler, Borelli'' (1973, Methuen), pp. 277–279</ref> [[File:Moon apsidal precession.png|thumb|alt=Apsidal precession refers to the rotation of the Moon's elliptical orbit over time, with the major axis completing one revolution every 8.85 years.|Moon's elliptical orbit (not to scale and eccentricity exaggerated)]] The basis for the modern understanding of orbits was first formulated by [[Johannes Kepler]] whose results are summarised in his three laws of planetary motion. First, he found that the orbits of the planets in our [[Solar System]] are elliptical, not [[circle|circular]] (or [[epicycle|epicyclic]]), as had previously been believed, and that the Sun is not located at the center of the orbits, but rather at one [[focus (geometry)|focus]].<ref name="Kepler's Laws of Planetary Motion">{{cite web|url=http://physics.about.com/od/astronomy/p/keplerlaws.htm|title=Kepler's Laws of Planetary Motion|last=Jones|first=Andrew|publisher=[[about.com]]|access-date=1 June 2008|archive-date=18 November 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161118041151/http://physics.about.com/od/astronomy/p/keplerlaws.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> Second, he found that the orbital speed of each planet is not constant, as had previously been thought, but rather that the speed depends on the planet's distance from the Sun. Third, Kepler found a universal relationship between the orbital properties of all the planets orbiting the Sun. For the planets, the cubes of their distances from the Sun are proportional to the squares of their orbital periods. Jupiter and Venus, for example, are respectively about 5.2 and 0.723 [[astronomical unit|AU]] distant from the Sun, their orbital periods respectively about 11.86 and 0.615 years. The proportionality is seen by the fact that the ratio for Jupiter, 5.2<sup>3</sup>/11.86<sup>2</sup>, is practically equal to that for Venus, 0.723<sup>3</sup>/0.615<sup>2</sup>, in accord with the relationship. Idealised orbits meeting these rules are known as [[Kepler orbits]]. [[Isaac Newton]] demonstrated that Kepler's laws were derivable from his theory of [[gravitation]] and that, in general, the orbits of bodies subject to gravity were [[conic section]]s (this assumes that the force of gravity propagates instantaneously). Newton showed that, for a pair of bodies, the orbits' sizes are in inverse proportion to their [[mass]]es, and that those bodies orbit their common [[center of mass]]. Where one body is much more massive than the other (as is the case of an artificial satellite orbiting a planet), it is a convenient approximation to take the center of mass as coinciding with the center of the more massive body. Advances in Newtonian mechanics were then used to explore variations from the simple assumptions behind Kepler orbits, such as the perturbations due to other bodies, or the impact of spheroidal rather than spherical bodies. [[Joseph-Louis Lagrange]] developed a [[Lagrangian mechanics|new approach]] to [[Newtonian mechanics]] emphasizing energy more than force, and made progress on the [[three-body problem]], discovering the [[Lagrangian points]]. In a dramatic vindication of classical mechanics, in 1846 [[Urbain Le Verrier]] was able to predict the position of [[Neptune]] based on unexplained perturbations in the orbit of [[Uranus]]. [[Albert Einstein]] in his 1916 paper ''The Foundation of the General Theory of Relativity'' explained that gravity was due to curvature of [[space-time]] and removed Newton's assumption that changes in gravity propagate instantaneously. This led astronomers to recognize that Newtonian mechanics did not provide the highest accuracy in understanding orbits. In [[relativity theory]], orbits follow geodesic trajectories which are usually approximated very well by the Newtonian predictions (except where there are very strong gravity fields and very high speeds) but the differences are measurable. Essentially all the experimental evidence that can distinguish between the theories agrees with relativity theory to within experimental measurement accuracy. The original vindication of general relativity is that it was able to account for the remaining unexplained amount in [[Tests of general relativity#Perihelion precession of Mercury|precession of Mercury's perihelion]] first noted by Le Verrier. However, Newton's solution is still used for most short term purposes since it is significantly easier to use and sufficiently accurate.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)