Editing Partisan Review (section)

==Publication history==
===Establishment===
The literary journal ''Partisan Review (PR)'' was launched in New York City in 1934<ref>{{cite journal|author=Louis D. Rubin Jr.|author-link=Louis D. Rubin Jr.|title=Several Literary Magazines|journal=[[The Sewanee Review]]|date=Spring 1965|volume=73|issue=2|pages=320–330|jstor=27541124}}</ref> by the [[John Reed Clubs|John Reed Club of New York]] — a [[mass organization]] of the [[Communist Party, USA]] (CPUSA).{{sfn|Gilbert|1974|p=548}} The publication was published and edited by two members of the New York club, [[Philip Rahv]] and [[William Phillips (editor)|William Phillips]]. The launch of the magazine was assisted by the editors of ''[[New Masses]],'' the Communist Party's national artistic and literary magazine, including [[Joseph Freeman (writer)|Joseph Freeman]].{{sfn|Gilbert|1974|pp=549–550}}

Early issues of the magazine included a mixture of ostensibly [[proletarian literature]] and essays of cultural commentary — the latter of which became a hallmark of ''PR'' for the whole of its nearly seven decades of existence. Rahv and Phillips were strongly committed to the idea that radical new artistic forms and radical politics could be successfully combined and were critical of much of the form and hackneyed content of much of what passed as "proletarian literature". This critical perspective brought the pair into conflict with party stalwarts at the ''New Masses'' such as [[Mike Gold]] and [[Granville Hicks]] but was not sufficient to break ''Partisan Review'' from the [[Communist Party USA]] (CPUSA) orbit.{{sfn|Gilbert|1974|p=549}}

In 1936 as part of its [[Popular Front]] strategy of uniting Communist and non-Communist intellectuals against [[fascism]], the CPUSA launched a new mass organization called the [[League of American Writers]], abandoning the John Reed Clubs as part of the change.{{sfn|Gilbert|1974|p=550}} ''PR'' editors Phillips and Rahv were disaffected by the change, seeing the new organization as a watering down and mainstreaming of the party's commitment to a new, radical, proletarian literature. Intellectual interest turned to events abroad and interest in ''PR'' faltered to the point that effective with its October 1936 issue, publication of the magazine was suspended.{{sfn|Gilbert|1974|p=550}}

===1937 relaunch===
While ''Partisan Review'' was relaunched by Rahv and Phillips in December 1937, it was changed at a fundamental level. News of the [[Great Purge]] in the Soviet Union and of Soviet duplicity in the [[Spanish Civil War]] pushed the pair of editors to a new outspokenly critical perspective. A new cast of editors were brought on board, including [[Dwight Macdonald]] and literary critic [[F. W. Dupee]], and a sympathy for [[Trotskyism]] began to make itself felt in the magazine's editorial political line. The CPUSA press was hostile, claiming that a party asset had been stolen. A new group of left-wing writers deeply critical of the Soviet Union began to write for the publication, including [[James Burnham]] and [[Sidney Hook]].{{sfn|Gilbert|1974|p=550}} The new period of independence had begun.

Effective with the [[Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact|Nazi-Soviet Pact of 1939]], the magazine began to divorce itself from the Communist movement altogether, including its dissident Trotskyist wing. Rahv and Phillips gave qualified support to the campaign for American rearmament and the country's preparation for war, opposed by Macdonald and another editor at the time, [[Clement Greenberg]]. A tentative truce between the editors averted a split, with Macdonald finally departing in 1943 to form the [[pacifism|pacifist]] magazine ''[[politics (magazine 1944-1949)|politics]]''.{{sfn|Gilbert|1974|p= 552}}

Anti-Communism began to loom in the ''raison d'être'' of ''Partisan Review'' in the post-war years and bolstered by the contributions of such writers as Hook, [[James T. Farrell|James Farrell]], [[George Orwell]], and [[Arthur Koestler]], the political trajectory of ''PR'' moved rightwards.{{sfn|Gilbert|1974|p= 552}} Increasingly conservative and [[nationalism|nationalist]], by the early 1950s the magazine had become devoutly supportive of American virtues and values, although critical of the country's biases and excesses.{{sfn|Gilbert|1974|p= 553}} Orwell had been the ''Partisan Review''{{'}}s London correspondent.<ref>{{cite magazine|title=Contributors |work=Partisan Review |volume= 16|number= 1 |date=January 1949|quote=[[George Orwell]], formerly ''PR''{{'}}s London correspondent and author of ''Animal Farm'' and other books, is at present living in the Hebrides where he is writing a novel.}}</ref>

=== Funding by the CIA ===
Although vehemently denied by founding editor William Phillips, following the [[Dissolution of the Soviet Union|fall of the Soviet Union]] it was revealed that ''Partisan Review'' was the recipient of money from the [[Central Intelligence Agency]] as part of its effort to shape intellectual opinion in the so-called "cultural cold war".{{sfn|Wilford |2008 |p= 103}} In 1953, the magazine found itself in financial difficulties, when one of its primary backstage financial backers, Allan D. Dowling, became embroiled in a costly divorce proceeding. The financial shortfall was made up by a $2,500 grant from the [[American Committee for Cultural Freedom]] (ACCF), a CIA front organization on the executive board of which editor Phillips sat throughout the decade of the 1950s.{{sfn|Wilford |2008 |p= 104}}

Additional CIA money came later in the 1950s. When the ACCF terminated its operations, half of the money remaining in the organization's coffers was transferred to ''Partisan Review.'' Additional funds came to the magazine to alleviate its financial problems in the 1950s in the form of a $10,000 donation from [[Time (magazine)|''Time'']] magazine publisher [[Henry Luce]]. Luce seems to have been instrumental in expediting contacts between ''PR'' publisher Phillips and Director of Central Intelligence [[Walter Bedell Smith]].{{sfn|Wilford |2008 |p= 104}}

A successor organization established by the CIA to funnel money to sympathetic groups and individuals, the [[Congress for Cultural Freedom]], stepped up to assist the magazine in the early 1960s, granting ''PR'' $3,000 a year for a three-year period in the guise of foreign magazine subscriptions.{{sfn|Wilford |2008 |p= 104}}

===Moves to Rutgers and Boston University===

In 1963, William Phillips negotiated a move of the editorial offices of ''Partisan Review'' to the campus of [[Rutgers University]] in [[New Brunswick, New Jersey|New Brunswick]], [[New Jersey]]. The university agreed to provide not only free office space and utilities, but also to cover the salary of an editor, an assistant editor, a secretary, and various [[graduate assistants]] to help with office tasks. In return, the university would gain prestige from association with the well-regarded literary journal and make uses of the services of the editor and assistant editor as lecturers in the school's English Department.{{sfn|Becker | 1993| p= 322}}

This arrangement proved satisfactory for both parties until June 1978, when Phillips approached the University's then-mandatory faculty retirement age of 70. Learning that no exception would be made for him, Phillips began shopping for a new home for ''Partisan Review''.{{sfn|Becker | 1993| p= 324}} The decision was ultimately made to relocate the magazine's editorial offices to [[Boston University]], where publication would be continued under the editorship of Phillips and Steven Marcus, with Edith Kurzweil remaining as the magazine's Executive Editor.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bu.edu/library/gotlieb-center/collections/partisan-review/ |title=Partisan Review |work=Howard Gotlieb Archival Research Center |publisher=Boston University|access-date=May 18, 2024}}</ref> Under terms of the new hosting agreement, ownership rights of ''Partisan Review's'' extensive archive were to be transferred to the new institution.{{sfn|Becker | 1993| p= 324}}

Having invested more than $1 million in ''Partisan Review'' over the years and stored the publication's archive since 1963, Rutgers physically blocked the transfer of ''PR's'' files to the new institution.{{sfn|Becker | 1993| p= 324}} A standoff resulted and attorneys for both parties hastily came to an agreement by which Phillips was allowed to remove back issues, financial files, and current documents necessary for the magazine's publication to Boston University with Rutgers holding the archival originals until the matter could be legally settled.{{sfn|Becker | 1993| p= 325}} An inventory of the magazine's papers was conducted and photocopies of critical documents made and the matter headed for court.{{sfn|Becker | 1993| p= 325}} 

In the lawsuit which followed, Phillips ultimately prevailing based on his contention that the magazine's records had been housed at Rutgers merely as a revokable "deposit" rather than a permanent gift.{{sfn|Becker | 1993| p= 326}}  Rutgers was allowed to microfilm the magazine's pre-1978 records with the originals were transferred to Boston University.{{sfn|Becker | 1993| p= 327}} 

The magazine's circulation was 8,150 in 1989.<ref name=NYT1989>{{cite news|title=A New Chapter in the Life of Story |first= Eleanor |last=Blau|date=Oct 3, 1989|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1989/10/03/arts/a-new-chapter-in-the-life-of-story.html?searchResultPosition=32}}</ref>

===Termination and legacy===
Phillips died in September 2002 at the age of 94. The journal continued under his wife, [[Edith Kurzweil]], at Boston University, until ceasing publication in April 2003.<ref name="dave">{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=HNHyiDm3__kC&pg=PA197|title=The New Media Invasion: Digital Technologies and the World They Unmake|author=John David Ebert|date=2 September 2011|publisher=McFarland|isbn=978-0-7864-8818-6|page=197|access-date=31 October 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine|first=Edith |last=Kurzweil |url=http://www.bu.edu/partisanreview|title=A Tribute to William Phillips |work=Partisan Review |volume= 70|number= 2 |date=Spring 2003}}</ref>