Editing Pigeon intelligence (section)

==Discrimination abilities of pigeons==
In an article from 1995, Watanabe, Sakamoto, and Wakita described an experiment which showed that pigeons can be trained to discriminate between paintings by [[Pablo Picasso|Picasso]] and by [[Claude Monet|Monet]]. The birds were first trained on a limited set of paintings. The experiment has shown that a pigeon was able to obtain food by repeated pecking when shown a painting from Picasso; when it was a Monet, pecking had no effect. After a while, the pigeons would only peck when shown Picasso paintings. They were then able to generalize and correctly discriminate between paintings of the two painters not previously shown, and even between [[cubism|cubist]] and [[impressionism|impressionist]] paintings (cubism and impressionism being the two stylistic schools Picasso and Monet belong to). When the Monet paintings were shown upside down, the pigeons were not able to properly categorize anymore. Showing the cubist works upside down did not have such an effect.

In 1995, the authors won the [[Ig Nobel Prize]] in psychology for this work.

In a later paper, Watanabe showed that if pigeons and human college students undergo the same training, their performance in distinguishing between [[Van Gogh]] and [[Chagall]] paintings is comparable.

[[File:The pigeons’ training environment.png|thumb|The chamber used to train and test pigeons' ability to classify images. Adapted from <ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|last1=Levenson|first1=Richard M.|last2=Krupinski|first2=Elizabeth A.|last3=Navarro|first3=Victor M.|last4=Wasserman|first4=Edward A.|date=2015-11-18|title=Pigeons (Columba livia) as Trainable Observers of Pathology and Radiology Breast Cancer Images|journal=PLOS ONE|language=en|volume=10|issue=11|pages=e0141357|doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0141357|issn=1932-6203|pmc=4651348|pmid=26581091|bibcode=2015PLoSO..1041357L|doi-access=free}}</ref>]]

Similar experiments had previously shown that pigeons could be trained to distinguish between photographs of human beings and photographs of other objects, such as trees.

In all these cases, discrimination is quite easy for humans, even though the classes are so complex that no simple distinguishing [[algorithm]] or rule can be specified. It has therefore been argued{{Citation needed|date=April 2010}} that pigeons are able to form "concepts" or "categories" similar to humans, but that interpretation is controversial. Nevertheless, the experiments remain important and often cited examples in [[cognitive science]].

Levenson et al.<ref name=":0" /> demonstrated in a 2015 paper that rock dove pigeons (''Columba livia''), which share many visual system properties with humans, can serve as promising surrogate observers of medical images, a capability not previously documented. The birds were tested on their ability to distinguish benign from malignant human breast histopathology images and could even apply what they had learned to previously unseen images. However, when faced with a more challenging task, they reverted to image memorisation and thus showed little generalisation to novel examples.