Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Political question
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Origin== The doctrine can be traced to the landmark [[Supreme Court of the United States|Supreme Court]] ruling in ''[[Marbury v. Madison]]'' (1803).<ref name=":6">''Marbury v. Madison'', 5 U.S. 137 (1803).</ref><ref name=":0">§ 15 "Case or Controversy"—Political Questions, 20 Fed. Prac. & Proc. Deskbook § 15 (2d ed.)</ref> In that case, [[Chief Justice of the United States|Chief Justice]] [[John Marshall]] distinguished between the [[United States Secretary of State|US Secretary of State's]] legal work and purely discretionary political tasks, only the former of which involves legally identifiable standards that can be reviewed by a court of law.<ref name=":6" /> Marshall argued that courts should generally not hear cases that involve political questions without implicating individual rights, though later decisions allowed the doctrine's application in cases that do implicate individual rights.<ref name=":6"/><ref name="Baker v. Carr 1962" />
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)