Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Power pop
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Definition and etymology== ===Characteristics=== {{multiple image|total_width=|direction=vertical | image1 = The Who Hamburg 1972 2 (cropped).jpg | image2 = Televisie-optreden van The Beatles in Treslong te Hillegom vlnr. Paul McCartney, Bestanddeelnr 916-5099.jpg | image3 = Sullivan Beach Boys (cropped).jpg | footer = From top: [[the Who]] (1972), [[the Beatles]] (1964), and [[the Beach Boys]] (1964) }} Power pop is a more aggressive form of [[pop rock]] that is based on catchy, melodic hooks and energetic moods.{{sfn|Borack|2007|pp=7–8}} [[AllMusic]] describes the style as "a cross between the crunching [[hard rock]] of [[the Who]] and the sweet melodicism of [[the Beatles]] and [[the Beach Boys]], with the [[jangle|ringing guitars]] of [[the Byrds]] thrown in for good measure".<ref name="Allmusic">{{cite web |url=http://www.allmusic.com/style/power-pop-ma0000002793 |title=Power Pop |website=[[AllMusic]] |access-date=November 26, 2012 |archive-date=September 19, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120919062543/http://www.allmusic.com/style/power-pop-ma0000002793 |url-status=live }}</ref> Virtually every artist of the genre has been a rock band consisting of white male musicians who engaged with the song forms, vocal arrangements, [[chord progression]]s, rhythm patterns, instrumentation, or overall sound associated with groups of the mid-1960s [[British Invasion]] era.{{sfn|Cateforis|2011|pp=136, 138}} An essential feature of power pop is that its cheerful sounding arrangements are supported by a sense of "yearning", "longing", or "despair" similar to formative works such as "[[Wouldn't It Be Nice]]" (the Beach Boys, 1966) and "[[Pictures of Lily]]" (the Who, 1967). This might be achieved with an unexpected harmonic change or lyrics that refer to "tonight", "tomorrow night", "Saturday night", and so on.<ref name="Chabon">{{cite web|last=Chabon|first=Michael|author-link=Michael Chabon|title=Tragic Magic: Reflections on Power Pop|url=http://michaelchabon.com/uncollected/musical/tragic-magic/|access-date=March 30, 2013|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://archive.today/20130411092844/http://michaelchabon.com/uncollected/musical/tragic-magic/|archive-date=April 11, 2013}}</ref> Power pop was also noted for its lack of irony and its reverence to classic pop craft.{{sfn|Cateforis|2011|pp=145, 149}} Its reconfiguration of 1960s tropes, music journalist [[Paul Lester]] argued, could make it one of the first [[postmodern]] music genres.<ref name="Lester">{{cite web |last1=Lester |first1=Paul |author-link=Paul Lester |title=Powerpop: 10 of the best |url=https://www.theguardian.com/music/musicblog/2015/feb/11/power-pop-10-of-the-best |website=[[The Guardian]] |date=February 11, 2015 |access-date=September 29, 2018 |archive-date=October 10, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181010111532/https://www.theguardian.com/music/musicblog/2015/feb/11/power-pop-10-of-the-best |url-status=live }}</ref> ===Scope and recognition=== The Who's [[Pete Townshend]] coined the term in a May 1967 interview promoting their latest single "Pictures of Lily".<ref name="Earles"/>{{sfn|Cateforis|2011|p=129}} He said: "Power pop is what we play—what the [[Small Faces]] used to play, and the kind of pop the Beach Boys played in the days of '[[Fun, Fun, Fun]]' which I preferred."<ref>{{cite journal |last=Altham |first=Keith |title=Lily Isn't Pornographic, Say Who |journal=[[NME]] |issue=20 May 1967}}</ref> Despite other bands following in the power pop continuum since then, the term was not popularized until the rise of [[new wave music]] in the late 1970s.{{sfn|Cateforis|2011|p=129}} [[Greg Shaw]], editor of ''[[Bomp!]]'' magazine, was the most prominent in the slew of music critics that wrote about power pop (then written as "powerpop"). This mirrored similar developments with the term "[[punk rock]]" from earlier in the decade. In light of this, Theo Cateforis, author of ''Are We Not New Wave?'' (2011), wrote that "the recognition and formulation" of power pop as a genre "was by no means organic."{{sfn|Cateforis|2011|pp=130, 132}} There is significant debate among fans over what should be classed as power pop.<ref name="Earles" /> Shaw took credit for codifying the genre in 1978, describing it as a hybrid style of pop and punk. He later wrote that "much to my chagrin, the term was snapped up by legions of limp, second-rate bands hoping the majors would see them as a safe alternative to punk."<ref>{{cite web|author-link=Greg Shaw|last=Shaw|first=Greg|date=1994|url=http://bomp.com/History.html |title=It was 20 years ago today{{nbsp}}...|publisher=Bomp.com |access-date=December 4, 2009|url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091212135740/http://www.bomp.com/history.html |archive-date=December 12, 2009}}</ref> Music journalist [[John M. Borack]] also stated in his 2007 book ''Shake Some Action – The Ultimate Guide to Power Pop'' that the label is often applied to varied groups and artists with "blissful indifference", noting its use in connection with [[Britney Spears]], [[Green Day]], [[the Bay City Rollers]] and [[Def Leppard]].{{sfn|Borack|2007|p=7}} Power pop has struggled with its critical reception and is sometimes viewed as a shallow style of music associated with teenage audiences. The perception was exacerbated by record labels in the early 1980s who used the term for marketing [[post-punk]] styles.<ref name="Shuker2017">{{cite book|last=Shuker|first=Roy|title=Popular Music: The Key Concepts|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7iIlDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA268|year=2017|publisher=Taylor & Francis|isbn=978-1-317-18954-1|pages=267–268|access-date=2019-07-25|archive-date=2020-08-18|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200818185329/https://books.google.com/books?id=7iIlDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA268|url-status=live}}</ref> Music critic Ken Sharp summarized that power pop is "the [[Rodney Dangerfield]] of rock 'n' roll.{{nbsp}}[...] the direct updating of the most revered artists—the Who, the Beach Boys, the Beatles—yet it gets no respect."<ref name="Earles" /> In 1996, singer-songwriter [[Tommy Keene]] commented that any association to the term since the 1980s is to be "compared to a lot of bands that didn't sell records, it's like a disease. If you're labeled that, you're history."<ref name="cost"/> Musician [[Steve Albini]] said: "I cannot bring myself to use the term 'power pop.' Catchy, mock-descriptive terms are for dilettantes and journalists. I guess you could say I think this music is for pussies and should be stopped."<ref>{{cite web |title=Power Pop: What I Like About You: Artists Surrender Their Favorite American Power Pop Songs |url=http://magnetmagazine.com/2002/09/09/power-pop-what-i-like-about-you-artists-surrender-their-favorite-american-power-pop-songs/ |website=[[Magnet (magazine)|Magnet]] |access-date=October 6, 2018 |date=September 9, 2002 |archive-date=October 6, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181006235418/http://magnetmagazine.com/2002/09/09/power-pop-what-i-like-about-you-artists-surrender-their-favorite-american-power-pop-songs/ |url-status=live }}</ref> [[Ken Stringfellow]] of [[the Posies]] concurred that "There’s a kind of aesthetic to power pop to be light on purpose. I wanted something with more gravitas."<ref name="louder17">{{cite web |last1=Lambeth |first1=Sam |title=Cheap Tricks and Big Stars: In Praise of Power Pop |url=https://louderthanwar.com/cheap-tricks-and-big-stars-in-praise-of-power-pop/ |website=[[Louder Than War]] |date=24 April 2017 |access-date=5 September 2019 |archive-date=5 September 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190905144937/https://louderthanwar.com/cheap-tricks-and-big-stars-in-praise-of-power-pop/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)