Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Pro-drop language
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Usage of term== In [[Noam Chomsky]]'s "Lectures on Government and Binding", the term is used for a cluster of properties of which "[[null subject]]" was one (for the occurrence of ''pro'' as a [[Predicate (grammar)|predicate]] rather than a [[subject (grammar)|subject]] in sentences with the [[copula (linguistics)|copula]] see Moro 1997).{{citation needed|date=December 2017}} Thus, a one-way correlation was suggested between [[agreement (linguistics)|inflectional agreement]] (AGR) and empty pronouns on the one hand and between no agreement and overt pronouns, on the other. In the classical version, languages which not only lack agreement morphology but also allow extensive dropping of pronouns—such as Japanese, Chinese, Korean, and Vietnamese—are not included, as is made clear in a footnote: "The principle suggested is fairly general, but does not apply to such languages as Japanese in which pronouns can be missing much more freely."<ref>{{Cite book|last=Chomsky|first=Noam|url=https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110884166/html|title=Lectures on Government and Binding|date=2010-12-14|publisher=De Gruyter Mouton|isbn=978-3-11-088416-6|language=en|doi=10.1515/9783110884166}}</ref> (Chomsky 1981:284, fn 47). The term pro-drop is also used in other frameworks in [[generative grammar]], such as in [[lexical functional grammar]] (LFG), but in a more general sense: "Pro-drop is a widespread linguistic phenomenon in which, under certain conditions, a structural NP may be unexpressed, giving rise to a pronominal interpretation."<ref>{{Cite book|last=Bresnan|first=Joan|title=The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations|publisher=[[MIT Press]]|year=1982|isbn=9780262021586|pages=384|language=English}}</ref> (Bresnan 1982:384). The [[empty category]] assumed (under [[government and binding theory]]) to be present in the vacant subject position left by pro-dropping is known as ''pro'', or as "[[little pro]]" (to distinguish it from "[[big PRO]]", an empty category associated with [[non-finite verb]] phrases).<ref>R.L. Trask, ''A Dictionary of Grammatical Terms in Linguistics'', Routledge 2013, p. 218.</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)