Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Probable cause
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Definition== The usual definition of the ''probable cause'' standard includes “a reasonable amount of suspicion, supported by circumstances sufficiently strong to justify a [[Reasonable person|prudent and cautious person’s]] belief that certain facts are probably true.”<ref>{{cite book |last=Handler |first=J. G. |title=Ballentine's Law Dictionary |edition=Legal Assistant |year=1994 |location=Albany |publisher=Delmar |page=431 |isbn=0827348746 }}</ref> Notably, this definition does not require that the person making the recognition must hold a public office or have public authority, which allows the citizenry’s common-sense understanding of the legal standard of ''probable cause'' for arrest. Regarding the issuance of a warrant for arrest, probable cause is the “information sufficient to warrant a prudent person’s belief that the wanted individual had committed a crime (for an arrest warrant) or that evidence of a crime or contraband would be found in a search (for a search warrant)”. As a legal standard, ''probable cause'' is stronger than [[reasonable suspicion]], but weaker than the requirement of evidence to secure a [[criminal conviction]]. Moreover, according to the ''[[Aguilar–Spinelli test]]'' a criminal court can choose to accept [[hearsay]] as a source of probable cause if the source-person is of reliable character or if other evidence supports the hearsay. In the case of ''[[Brinegar v. United States]]'' (1949), the Supreme Court defined probable cause as “where the facts and [the] circumstances within the officers’ knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient, in themselves, to warrant a belief, by a man of reasonable caution, that a crime is being committed.”<ref>''Brinegar v. United States'', {{ussc|338|160|1949}}.</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)