Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Procedural knowledge
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Overview == Procedural knowledge (i.e., knowledge-how) is different from [[descriptive knowledge]] (i.e., knowledge-that) in that it can be directly applied to a task.<ref name=SEP/><ref>{{Cite book|last=Burgin, M. S. (Mark Semenovich)|title=Theory of knowledge : structures and processes|year=2017|isbn=978-981-4522-67-0|location=New Jersey|pages=48|oclc=934627836}}</ref> For instance, the procedural knowledge one uses to solve problems differs from the declarative knowledge one possesses about [[problem solving]] because this knowledge is formed by doing.<ref name=Koedinger>Koedinger, K.R. & Corbett, A. (2006). "Technology Bringing Learning Sciences to the Classroom". In Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.), ''The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences''. pp. 61β75. New York: Cambridge University Press</ref> The distinction between knowing-how and knowing-that was brought to prominence in [[epistemology]] by [[Gilbert Ryle]] who used it in his book ''[[The Concept of Mind]]''.<ref name="Stanley 2001 411β444"/> Know-how is also often referred to in [[Plain English|layman's terms]] as '''street smarts''' (sometimes conceived as the opposite of [[wikt:book smart|book smart]]s), and a person employing their street smarts as ''street wise''. Know-how is often [[tacit knowledge]], which means that it can be difficult to transfer to another person by means of writing it down or verbalising it. The opposite of tacit knowledge is [[explicit knowledge]].
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)