Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Project Vanguard
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Project history == In the early 1950s, the [[American Rocket Society]] set up an ad hoc Committee on Space Flight, of which [[Milton W. Rosen]], NRL project manager for the [[Viking (rocket)|Viking rocket]], became chair. Encouraged by conversations between Richard W. Porter of [[General Electric]] and [[Alan T. Waterman]], Director of the [[National Science Foundation]] (NSF), Rosen on 27 November 1954, completed a report describing the potential value of launching an Earth satellite. The report was submitted to the NSF early in 1955.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/SP-4202/begin.html |title=''Vanguard β A History'', Chapter 1. Constance M. Green and Milton Lomask, NASA SP-4202. NASA Historical Reference Collection, NASA History Office, NASA Headquarters, Washington, D.C. and |access-date=8 October 2009 |archive-date=22 June 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100622200847/http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/SP-4202/begin.html |url-status=dead }}</ref> As part of planning for the [[International Geophysical Year]] (1957β1958), the U.S. publicly undertook to place an artificial satellite with a scientific experiment into orbit around the Earth. === The three services' proposals === Proposals to do this were presented by the [[United States Air Force]] (USAF), the [[United States Army]] (USA), and the [[United States Navy]] (USN). The Army Ballistic Missile Agency (ABMA) under Dr. [[Wernher von Braun]] had suggested using a modified [[Redstone (rocket)|Redstone rocket]] (see: [[Juno I]]) while the Air Force had proposed using the [[Atlas ICBM|Atlas launch vehicle]], which did not yet exist. The Navy proposed designing a [[rocket]] system based on the [[Viking rocket|Viking]] and [[Aerobee rocket]] systems. The Air Force proposal was not seriously considered, as Atlas development was years behind the other vehicles. Among other limitations, the Army submission focused on the launch vehicle, while a payload was assumed to become available from the [[Jet Propulsion Laboratory]] (JPL), and the network of ground tracking stations was assumed to be a Navy project. The Navy proposal detailed all three aspects of the mission.<ref>Green & Lomask, 1970 ''loc cit'', Chapter 3</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)