Editing Prussian Trust (section)

==Compensation claims against Poland==
Rudi Pawelka told the ''[[Daily Telegraph]]'' on 15 February 2004 that: 
{{Blockquote|Germans held lands and properties in what is now Poland for hundreds of years. They have a deep, inner connection to the region and many want their properties back. Soon we will all be Europeans. Poland's accession to the [[EU]] will enable us to take our case to the [[Strasbourg court]] for the first time. Poland must not be allowed to discriminate against Germans.{{sfn|Paterson|2004}} }}

The then-[[Chancellor of Germany (Federal Republic)|German chancellor]] [[Gerhard Schröder]] stated on 1 August 2004 that the German government will not support these claims. Also, the Polish [[Sejm]] declared that Poland will demand war reparations from [[Germany]] if the German government does not end the press for compensations. Some German politicians stated that the claims by the Sejm were ridiculous and had no legal basis. The corporation's activities have been repudiated by some German politicians who have addressed the issue, including the president of the Federation of Expellees, [[Erika Steinbach]].{{sfn|Puhl|Wassermann|2007}}

In December 2006, the corporation filed 23 individual claims against Poland in the [[European Court of Human Rights]], an action which has been condemned by both the Polish and German governments.{{sfn|Staff writer|2006}}

The Polish government decided that the submissions warranted a comment by [[Anna Fotyga]], the Polish Minister of the Foreign Affairs who "express [her] deepest concern upon receiving the information about a claim against Poland submitted by the Prussian Trust to the European Court of Human Rights".{{sfn|Fotyga2006}}
{{Blockquote|Contributory factors to the special quality of relations between Germany and Poland include the former’s unconditional admission of guilt for the Second World War and its renouncement of subsequent material claims after the war. The Federal Government supports neither private restitution claims by expellees nor complaints like that submitted by the private Prussian Trust to the European Court of Human Rights. Federal Chancellor Merkel has repeatedly reaffirmed this position. (The German Federal Foreign Office, October 2008).{{sfn|German Federal Foreign Office|2007}}{{efn|Similar text was on the page in January 2007 (first time it was checked). When the page was [https://web.archive.org/web/20081130080036/http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/diplo/en/Laenderinformationen/01-Laender/Polen.html updated in March 2008] the text (slightly modified from the initial text) remained on the page. It had been altered by [https://web.archive.org/web/20090417062330/http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/diplo/en/Laenderinformationen/01-Laender/Polen.html#t1 17 April 2009] (after the European Court of Human Rights case was finished to include a mention of the court's verdict).}} }}

On 9 October 2008 the European Court of Human Rights declared the case of ''Preussische Treuhand v. Poland '' inadmissible, because of the [[non-retroactivity]] of the [[European Convention on Human Rights]]: {{blockquote|
The Court would recall that Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 cannot be interpreted as imposing any general obligation on the Contracting States to return property which was transferred to them before they ratified the Convention. Nor does this provision impose any restrictions on the Contracting States’ freedom to determine the scope of property restitution or rehabilitation laws. The States are free to choose the conditions under which they agree to restore property rights of former owners and the Convention imposes no specific obligation on them to provide redress for wrongs or damage caused prior to their ratification of the Convention ...|[[Nicolas Bratza]] President of the Court.{{sfn|Bratza|2008}} }}