Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Psychophysics
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==History== Many of the classical techniques and theories of psychophysics were formulated in 1860 when [[Gustav Fechner|Gustav Theodor Fechner]] in Leipzig published ''Elemente der Psychophysik (Elements of Psychophysics)''.<ref name="Fechner">{{cite book | author=Gustav Theodor Fechner | year=1860 | title=Elemente der Psychophysik (Elements of Psychophysics)}}</ref> He coined the term "psychophysics", describing research intended to relate physical stimuli to the contents of consciousness such as sensations ''(Empfindungen)''. As a physicist and philosopher, Fechner aimed at developing a method that relates matter to the mind, connecting the publicly observable world and a person's privately experienced impression of it. His ideas were inspired by experimental results on the sense of touch and light obtained in the early 1830s by the German physiologist [[Ernst Heinrich Weber]] in [[Leipzig]],<ref name="Snodgrass">Snodgrass JG. 1975. Psychophysics. In: ''Experimental Sensory Psychology''. B Scharf. (Ed.) pp. 17–67.</ref><ref name="GescheiderChap1">{{cite book |author=Gescheider G |year=1997 |title=Psychophysics: the fundamentals | edition=3rd |publisher=Lawrence Erlbaum Associates | chapter=Chapter 1: Psychophysical Measurement of Thresholds: Differential Sensitivity |isbn=978-0-8058-2281-6 }}</ref> most notably those on the minimum discernible difference in intensity of stimuli of moderate strength (just noticeable difference; jnd) which Weber had shown to be a constant fraction of the reference intensity, and which Fechner referred to as Weber's law. From this, Fechner derived his well-known logarithmic scale, now known as [[Weber–Fechner law|Fechner scale]]. Weber's and Fechner's work formed one of the bases of psychology as a [[science]], with [[Wilhelm Wundt]] founding the first laboratory for psychological research in Leipzig (Institut für experimentelle Psychologie). Fechner's work systematised the introspectionist approach (psychology as the science of consciousness), that had to contend with the Behaviorist approach in which even verbal responses are as physical as the stimuli. Fechner's work was studied and extended by [[Charles Sanders Peirce|Charles S. Peirce]], who was aided by his student [[Joseph Jastrow]], who soon became a distinguished experimental psychologist in his own right. Peirce and Jastrow largely confirmed Fechner's empirical findings, but not all. In particular, a classic experiment of Peirce and Jastrow rejected Fechner's estimation of a threshold of perception of weights. In their experiment, Peirce and Jastrow in fact invented randomized experiments: They randomly assigned volunteers to a [[Blind experiment|blinded]], [[repeated measures design|repeated-measures design]] to evaluate their ability to discriminate weights.<ref name="smalldiff">{{cite journal| author=[[Charles Sanders Peirce]] and [[Joseph Jastrow]]|year=1885|title=On Small Differences in Sensation|url=http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Peirce/small-diffs.htm| journal=Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences|volume=3|pages=73–83}}</ref><ref name="telepathy">{{cite journal|doi=10.1086/354775|first=Ian |last=Hacking| author-link=Ian Hacking | title=Telepathy: Origins of Randomization in Experimental Design|journal=[[Isis (journal)|Isis]]|issue=3, "A Special Issue on Artifact and Experiment"|volume=79|date=September 1988 |pages=427–451|jstor=234674 | mr = 1013489|s2cid=52201011 }}</ref><ref name="stigler">{{cite journal|doi=10.1086/444032|author=Stephen M. Stigler|title=A Historical View of Statistical Concepts in Psychology and Educational Research| journal=American Journal of Education| volume=101|issue=1|date=November 1992|pages=60–70|s2cid=143685203|author-link=Stephen M. Stigler}}</ref><ref name="dehue">{{cite journal|doi=10.1086/383850|author=Trudy Dehue|title=Deception, Efficiency, and Random Groups: Psychology and the Gradual Origination of the Random Group Design|journal=[[Isis (journal)|Isis]]|volume=88|issue=4|date=December 1997|pages=653–673|pmid=9519574|s2cid=23526321|url=https://www.rug.nl/research/portal/files/71855616/237831.pdf}}</ref> On the basis of their results they argued that the underlying functions were continuous, and that there is no threshold below which a difference in physical magnitude would be undetected. Peirce's experiment inspired other researchers in psychology and education, which developed a research tradition of randomized experiments in laboratories and specialized textbooks in the 1900s.<ref name="smalldiff"/><ref name="telepathy"/><ref name="stigler"/><ref name="dehue"/> The Peirce–Jastrow experiments were conducted as part of Peirce's application of his [[pragmaticism]] program to [[human perception]]; other studies considered the perception of light, etc.<ref>{{cite journal|author=Joseph Jastrow|title=Charles S. Peirce as a Teacher|journal=The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods|date=21 December 1916|volume=13|issue=26|pages=723–726|doi=10.2307/2012322|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rWzhSTaKgwYC|jstor=2012322|author-link=Joseph Jastrow}}and [http://www.google.com/search?q=Peirce+Jastrow+%22to+record+an+impression%22 text-string search]</ref> Jastrow wrote the following summary: "Mr. Peirce's courses in logic gave me my first real experience of intellectual muscle. Though I promptly took to the laboratory of psychology when that was established by [[G. Stanley Hall|Stanley Hall]], it was Peirce who gave me my first training in the handling of a psychological problem, and at the same time stimulated my self-esteem by entrusting me, then fairly innocent of any laboratory habits, with a real bit of research. He borrowed the apparatus for me, which I took to my room, installed at my window, and with which, when conditions of illumination were right, I took the observations. The results were published over our joint names in the ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences''. The demonstration that traces of sensory effect too slight to make any registry in consciousness could none the less influence judgment, may itself have been a persistent motive that induced me years later to undertake a book on ''The Subconscious''." This work clearly distinguishes observable cognitive performance from the expression of consciousness. Modern approaches to sensory perception, such as research on vision, hearing, or touch, measure what the perceiver's judgment extracts from the stimulus, often putting aside the question what sensations are being experienced. One leading method is based on [[Detection theory|signal detection theory]], developed for cases of very weak stimuli. However, the subjectivist approach persists among those in the tradition of [[Stanley Smith Stevens]] (1906–1973). Stevens revived the idea of a [[power law]] suggested by 19th century researchers, in contrast with Fechner's log-linear function (cf. [[Stevens' power law]]). He also advocated the assignment of numbers in ratio to the strengths of stimuli, called magnitude estimation. Stevens added techniques such as magnitude production and cross-modality matching. He opposed the assignment of stimulus strengths to points on a line that are labeled in order of strength. Nevertheless, that sort of response has remained popular in applied psychophysics. Such multiple-category layouts are often misnamed [[Likert scale|Likert scaling]] after the question items used by Likert to create multi-item psychometric scales, e.g., seven phrases from "strongly agree" through "strongly disagree". Omar Khaleefa<ref name=Khaleefa>{{cite journal |author=Omar Khaleefa |year=1999 |title=Who Is the Founder of Psychophysics and Experimental Psychology? |journal=American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences |volume=16 |issue=2}}</ref> has argued that the medieval scientist [[Alhazen]] should be considered the founder of psychophysics. Although al-Haytham made many subjective reports regarding vision, there is no evidence that he used quantitative psychophysical techniques and such claims have been rebuffed.<ref name=AaenStockdale>{{cite journal |author=Aaen-Stockdale, C.R. |year=2008 |title=Ibn al-Haytham and psychophysics |journal=Perception |volume=37 |issue=4 |pages=636–638 |doi=10.1068/p5940 |pmid=18546671|s2cid=43532965 }}</ref>{{Dubious|Ibn al-Haytham|reason=Given al-Haytham's enormous contribution, the statement sounds condescending|date=August 2023}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)