Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Quotation
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Comparison between direct, indirect, and free indirect speech== * '''Quoted''' or '''direct speech''':{{efn|name=TerminologicalNote|Both direct speech and indirect speech purport to report the speech or thoughts of an original speaker. Some writers use the terms ''reported direct speech'' and ''reported indirect speech''<ref name="Huddleston 2002 p1023">{{Cite book|quote='''Direct reported speech''' purports to give the actual wording of the original, whereas '''indirect reported speech''' gives only its content. ...[Note:] Some writers omit the 'reported' and simply talk of 'direct speech' and 'indirect speech', while others restrict the term 'reported speech' to the indirect type; we believe, however, that it is useful to have a term for covering both. Further alternative terms for direct and indirect reported speech are 'oratio recta' and 'oratio obliqua', respectively. |pages=1023β1030|last1=Huddleston |first1=Rodney |authorlink1=Rodney Huddleston|last2= Pullum |first2= Geoffrey |authorlink2=Geoffrey Pullum|title=The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language |date=2002 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge; New York |isbn=0-521-43146-8}}</ref>}} ''Direct speech'' and ''indirect speech'' can also refer to the difference between speech acts where the [[illocutionary force]] is conveyed directly and indirectly, respectively. Thus, "What time is it?" is a direct speech act that might also be expressed by the indirect speech act "Do you know what time it is?"<ref name="Huddleston 2002 p861">{{Cite book|pages=861β865|last1=Huddleston |first1=Rodney |authorlink1=Rodney Huddleston|last2= Pullum |first2= Geoffrey |authorlink2=Geoffrey Pullum|title=The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language |date=2002 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge; New York |isbn=0-521-43146-8}}</ref> :He laid down his bundle and thought of his misfortune. "And just what pleasure have I found since I came into this world?" he asked. * '''Reported''' or normal '''[[indirect speech]]''':{{efn|name=TerminologicalNote}} :He laid down his bundle and thought of his misfortune. He asked himself what pleasure he had found since he came into the world. * '''[[Free indirect speech]]''':{{efn|name=TerminologicalNote}} :He laid down his bundle and thought of his misfortune. And just what pleasure had he found since he came into this world? A crucial semantic distinction between direct and indirect speech is that direct speech purports to report the exact words that were said or written, whereas indirect speech is a representation of speech in one's own words.<ref name="Leech">{{cite book|pages=[https://archive.org/details/glossaryenglishg00leec/page/n40 34], 101 |last1=Leech |first1=Geoffrey|title=A Glossary of English Grammar|url=https://archive.org/details/glossaryenglishg00leec |url-access=limited |year=2006 |publisher=Edinburgh University Press|isbn=978-0-7486-1729-6}}</ref> The distinction between indirect speech and free indirect speech is mostly one of style, hence free indirect speech is sometimes described as a free indirect style.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)