Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Ramsey–Lewis method
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Overview== A [[scientific theory]] which attempts to describe "[[electron]]s" is inherently abstract, as no one has ever observed an electron directly. Thus, the origin and content of the concept of "electron" is questionable. What does the word exactly signify? Ramsey and Lewis proposed that the meaning of the term "electron" is implicitly generated by the scientific theory that describes it, via all its assertions about electrons. Electrons are those things about which all the statements of the theory are true. However, some of those statements in a theory refer to other unobserved entities and properties such as "charge" or "spin". For instance, "Electrons attract [[proton]]s" and "Electrons have negative charge" employ the terms "protons" and "negative charge" (with the latter also implicitly using the concept of "charge"). These properties are formalized, statements (such as [[Causality|conditionals]]) are formed using them, and those statements taken together are the [[definition]] of the term. Consider a sentence such as "There's an electron in the sink." This means something along the lines of: "There exist some properties ''P''<sub>1</sub>, ''P''<sub>2</sub>, ..., ''P''<sub>''n''</sub> ( one for every theoretical property involved in the scientific theory, with 'electronhood' (which roughly corresponds to the [[essence]] of an [[electron]] included as ''P''<sub>1</sub>) such that... (a statement in the scientific theory, but with ''P''<sub>1</sub>, ..., ''P''<sub>''n''</sub> substituted for the specific terms such as 'charge', 'is an electron', etc. employed by the theory), and there is something in the sink that has ''P''<sub>1</sub>." The process of converting the narrative form of a scientific theory into [[second-order logic]] is commonly called "Ramsification" (sometimes also spelled "Ramseyfication"). Example: Suppose there are only three principles in our scientific theory about electrons (those principles can be seen to be statements involving the properties): A1. Electrons (things that have P1) have charge (P2). A2. Things with charge (P2) tickle you. A3. Electrons (things that have P1) cause lightning. Furthermore, we include the property of "electronhood", as outlined above, to be designated by ''P''<sub>1</sub>, and the property of "charge" to be designated by ''P''<sub>2</sub>. Then the meaning of a sentence such as "I have an electron in my pocket" is Ramsified into: "There are properties ''P''<sub>1</sub> and ''P''<sub>2</sub> such that (things with ''P''<sub>1</sub> also have ''P''<sub>2</sub>, and things with ''P''<sub>2</sub> tickle you, and things with ''P''<sub>1</sub> cause lightning, and there is a thing with ''P''<sub>1</sub> in my pocket)." ({{harvnb|Toraldo di Francia|1981|p=74}}, who cites {{harvnb|Ramsey|2013}}.)
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)