Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Religious war
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Definitions == {{See also|Just war theory|Religious terrorism|Religious violence}} [[Konrad Repgen]] (1987) pointed out that belligerents may have multiple intentions to wage a war, may have had ulterior motives that historians can no longer discover, and therefore, calling something a 'religious war' (or '[[war of succession]]') based merely on a motive that a belligerent may have had, does not necessarily make it one.<ref name="Onnekink">{{Cite book |last=Onnekink |first=David |date=2013 |title=War and Religion after Westphalia, 1648β1713 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XfmhAgAAQBAJ |publisher=Ashgate Publishing |pages=76β77 |isbn= 9781409480211|access-date=12 March 2022}}</ref> Although ulterior motives may never be known, war proclamations do provide evidence for a belligerent's legitimisation of the war to the public.<ref name="Onnekink"/> Repgen therefore concluded: {{cquote|...wars should only be termed [religious wars], in so far as at least one of the belligerents lays claim to 'religion', a religious law, in order to justify his warfare and to substantiate publicly why his use of military force against a political authority should be a ''bellum iustum''.<ref name="Onnekink"/>}} [[Philip Benedict]] (2006) argued that Repgen's definition of 'religious war' was too narrow, because sometimes both legitimisation and motivation can be established.<ref name="Onnekink"/> David Onnekink (2013) added that a 'religious war' is not necessarily the same as a 'holy war' (''bellum sacrum''): "After all, it is perfectly acceptable to suggest that a worldly prince, say, a Lutheran prince in Reformation Germany, engages in religious warfare using mercenary armies."<ref name="Onnekink"/> While a holy war needs to be authorised by a religious leader and fought by pious soldiers, a religious war does not, he reasoned.<ref name="Onnekink"/> His definition of 'war of religion' thus became: {{cquote|a war legitimised by religion and/or for religious ends (but possibly fought by secular leaders and soldiers).<ref name="Onnekink"/>}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)