Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Reserved powers
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== By country == === Common law countries === The [[United Kingdom]] and countries whose legal system is [[Common law#Propagation of the common law to the colonies and Commonwealth by reception statutes|based on common law]], such as [[Canada]], [[India]], [[Israel]], and [[Ireland]], have similar legal frameworks of reserved powers.<ref>{{citation|url=https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-151008.pdf|title=The UK Supreme Court in the United Kingdom Constitution|author=[[Brenda Hale, Baroness Hale of Richmond|Brenda Hale]]|date=October 8, 2015}}</ref>{{Failed verification|date=November 2023|only discusses UK}} ==== Australia ==== In Australia, despite the centralized nature of the constitution, the High Court adopted the "[[reserved powers doctrine]]" which was used until 1920 to preserve as much autonomy for the states as can be interpreted from the constitution. This practice changed with the [[Amalgamated Society of Engineers v Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd|Engineers' Case]] which led reserved powers to be given to the Commonwealth.<ref name="Aroney 2008">{{cite journal|last=Aroney |first=N |title=Constitutional Choices in the Work Choices Case, or What Exactly Is Wrong with the Reserved Powers Doctrine? |journal=Melbourne University Law Review |year=2008 |url=http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/MelbULawRw/2008/1.html}} (2008) 32 [[Melbourne University Law Review]] 1.</ref> ==== Canada ==== In Canada the reserved powers lie with the federal government.<ref name="nerenberg">[https://us.nicebooks.com/book/6345053 Handbook of Federal Countries, 2002: A project of the Forum of Federations] (Paperback, 528 pages), by Karl Nerenberg, Ann L. Griffiths, Debbie Courtois, Mar 24, 2003, McGill-Queen's University Press. {{ISBN|9780773525115}} - Page 8, in Introduction, by John Kincaid.</ref> === United States === In the [[United States]], the [[Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Tenth Amendment]] of the Constitution states that the powers not granted to the [[federal government of the United States|federal government]] are reserved to the states, unless prohibited to the states.<ref name="nerenberg" /><ref name="uslegal">{{citation|url=https://definitions.uslegal.com/r/reserved-power/|title=Reserved Power Law and Legal Definition|publisher=US Legal, Inc.|accessdate=August 8, 2018}}</ref> This amendment does not refer to powers “explicitly” or “expressly” granted to the federal government, and therefore the federal government possesses many [[implied powers]] that are not reserved to the states.<ref>Frank, Walter. ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=kXsZD1BwE74C&pg=PA33 Making Sense of the Constitution: A Primer on the Supreme Court and Its Struggle to Apply Our Fundamental Law]'', p. 33 ([[Southern Illinois University Press]], 2012).</ref> After [[World War II]], the [[Supreme Court of the United States|Supreme Court]] often ruled against parties challenging the powers of [[United States Congress|Congress]] per the Tenth Amendment, with exceptions during the [[Rehnquist Court]].<ref name=":0">{{Cite book|last=McAffee|first=Thomas B.|title=Powers reserved for the people and the states : a history of the Ninth and Tenth Amendments|date=2006|publisher=Praeger Publishers|others=Bybee, Jay S., Bryant, A. Christopher.|isbn=0-313-31372-5|location=Westport, Conn.|pages=177|oclc=69992386}}</ref> The Supreme Court continues to occasionally decide cases striking down federal laws that exceed both the explicit and implied powers of Congress, as in ''[[Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association]]'' (2018). In the United States, many powers that are not reserved to the states are [[exclusive federal powers]], and thus states are forbidden to exercise them. Alternatively, powers that are not reserved to the states may be [[concurrent powers]] that both the states and federal government can exercise at the same time (such as the power to enact taxes to raise revenue).<ref>''[https://books.google.com/books?id=MLhxnmmtivwC&pg=PA31 The Complete Idiot's Guide to U.S. Government and Politics]'', p. 31 (Penguin 2009).</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)