Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Return loss
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Sign == As defined above, RL will always be positive, since ''P''<sub>r</sub> can never exceed ''P''<sub>i</sub>. However, return loss has historically been expressed as a negative number, and this convention is still widely found in the literature.<ref name=Bird>Trevor S. Bird, [https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5162049/;jsessionid=2EF091A77801B0C8C3DE98C8B15CD450?arnumber=5162049 "Definition and Misuse of Return Loss"], ''IEEE Antennas & Propagation Magazine'', vol. 51, iss. 2, pp. 166β167, April 2009.</ref> Strictly speaking, if a negative sign is ascribed to RL, the ratio of ''reflected'' to ''incident'' power is implied: : <math>\text{RL}'(\text{dB}) = 10 \log_{10} \frac{P_\text{r}}{P_\text{i}},</math> where RLβ²(dB) is the negative of RL(dB). In practice, the sign ascribed to RL is largely immaterial. If a transmission line includes several discontinuities along its length, the total return loss will be the sum of the RLs caused by each discontinuity, and provided all RLs are given the same sign, no error or ambiguity will result. Whichever convention is used, it will always be understood that ''P''<sub>r</sub> can never exceed ''P''<sub>i</sub>.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)