Editing Robinson projection (section)

==Strengths and weaknesses==
The Robinson projection is neither [[Equal-area projection|equal-area]] nor [[conformal map projection|conformal]], abandoning both for a compromise. The creator felt that this produced a better overall view than could be achieved by adhering to either. The [[Meridian (geography)|meridian]]s curve gently, avoiding extremes, but thereby stretch the poles into long lines instead of leaving them as points.<ref name="impossible"/>

Hence, distortion close to the poles is severe, but quickly declines to moderate levels moving away from them. The straight parallels imply severe angular distortion at the high latitudes toward the outer edges of the map – a fault inherent in any pseudocylindrical projection. However, at the time it was developed, the projection effectively met Rand McNally's goal to produce appealing depictions of the entire world.<ref>{{cite news |title=Arthur H. Robinson, 89; Cartographer Hailed for Map's Elliptical Design |url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2004-nov-17-me-robinson17-story.html |newspaper=Los Angeles Times |access-date=1 May 2012 |author=Myrna Oliver |date=November 17, 2004}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Arthur H. Robinson, 89 Geographer improved world map |url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/2004/11/16/arthur-h-robinson-89/ |newspaper=Chicago Tribune |access-date=1 May 2012 |author=New York Times News Service |date=November 16, 2004}}</ref>

{{quote|I decided to go about it backwards. … I started with a kind of artistic approach. I visualized the best-looking shapes and sizes. I worked with the variables until it got to the point where, if I changed one of them, it didn't get any better. Then I figured out the mathematical formula to produce that effect. Most mapmakers start with the mathematics.|1988 ''[[New York Times]]'' article<ref name="impossible"/>}}