Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Romberg's method
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Method == Using <math display="inline">h_n = \frac{(b-a)}{2^n}</math>, the method can be inductively defined by <math display="block">\begin{align} R(0,0) &= h_0 (f(a) + f(b)) \\ R(n,0) &= \tfrac{1}{2} R(n-1,0) + 2h_n \sum_{k=1}^{2^{n-1}} f(a + (2k-1)h_{n-1}) \\ R(n,m) &= R(n,m-1) + \tfrac{1}{4^m-1} (R(n,m-1) - R(n-1,m-1)) \\ &= \frac{1}{4^m-1} ( 4^m R(n,m-1) - R(n-1, m-1)) \end{align}</math> where <math> n \ge m </math> and <math> m \ge 1 \, </math>. In [[big O notation]], the error for ''R''(''n'', ''m'') is:<ref>{{Harvnb|Mysovskikh|2002}}</ref> <math> O\left(h_n^{2m+2}\right).</math> The zeroeth extrapolation, {{math|''R''(''n'', 0)}}, is equivalent to the [[trapezoidal rule]] with {{math|2<sup>''n''</sup> + 1}} points; the first extrapolation, {{math|''R''(''n'', 1)}}, is equivalent to [[Simpson's rule]] with {{math|2<sup>''n''</sup> + 1}} points. The second extrapolation, {{math|''R''(''n'', 2)}}, is equivalent to [[Boole's rule]] with {{math|2<sup>''n''</sup> + 1}} points. The further extrapolations differ from Newton-Cotes formulas. In particular further Romberg extrapolations expand on Boole's rule in very slight ways, modifying weights into ratios similar as in Boole's rule. In contrast, further Newton-Cotes methods produce increasingly differing weights, eventually leading to large positive and negative weights. This is indicative of how large degree interpolating polynomial Newton-Cotes methods fail to converge for many integrals, while Romberg integration is more stable. By labelling our <math display="inline">O(h^2)</math> approximations as <math display="inline">A_0\big(\frac{h}{2^n}\big)</math> instead of <math display="inline">R(n,0)</math>, we can perform Richardson extrapolation with the error formula defined below: <math display="block"> \int_a^b f(x) \, dx = A_0\bigg(\frac{h}{2^n}\bigg)+a_0\bigg(\frac{h}{2^n}\bigg)^{2} + a_1\bigg(\frac{h}{2^n}\bigg)^{4} + a_2\bigg(\frac{h}{2^n}\bigg)^{6} + \cdots </math> Once we have obtained our <math display="inline">O(h^{2(m+1)})</math> approximations <math display="inline">A_m\big(\frac{h}{2^n}\big)</math>, we can label them as <math display="inline">R(n,m)</math>. When function evaluations are expensive, it may be preferable to replace the polynomial interpolation of Richardson with the rational interpolation proposed by {{Harvtxt|Bulirsch|Stoer|1967}}.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)