Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Serial Copy Management System
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==History== SCMS was created as a compromise between electronics manufacturers, mainly [[Sony]] and [[Philips]], who wanted to make DAT machines available in the United States, and the [[RIAA]], which had previously hampered the availability of DAT machines in the US with the threat of lawsuits. The RIAA did not want low-cost digital recorders readily available, since it felt that such technology would result in widespread piracy. These lawsuit threats resulted in a [[Chilling effect (term)|chilling effect]], which prevented DAT decks from becoming readily affordable. In 1987, a member of the RIAA <!-- It was a particular record company, but I forget its name right now --> proposed a system where DAT recorders would have copy protection in them. The copy protection would look for the presence of frequencies in a particular high-frequency <!-- Somewhere around 4800 kHz as I recall --> band; if there was no audio present in this band, the recorder would assume that the music in question was copy protected, and would not allow recording of the music. The record companies would then release all music with this particular frequency band filtered out. It would be illegal to manufacture a DAT machine with the presence of audio in this frequency band; the RIAA was lobbying Congress to make this the law of the land. The reaction to this proposed scheme was very negative. The [[Home Recording Rights Coalition]] orchestrated a letter writing campaign opposing this scheme. Editorials in musician's and home stereo magazines attacked this scheme. The proposed law never made it out of committee. Even after this law was shot down, the RIAA still threatened to sue anyone who released an affordable consumer DAT recorder in the US. No one made such a recorder available. In 1992, Congress passed the [[Audio Home Recording Act]]. In this law, blank digital media (including DAT tapes and music CD-Rs) [[Private copying levy|would be taxed]], with the money going to the RIAA, and a new copy protection scheme, SCMS, would be enforced. Blank analog media, such as cassette tapes, were not subject to the tax. SCMS was compulsory in digital media because there is zero deterioration of quality from copy to copy. SCMS was universally disliked by home musicians who used DAT decks to record their own music; the acronym was pronounced as a derogatory term, "scums".<ref name=axford>{{cite book|last=Axford|first=Elizabeth C.|title=Song sheets to software : a guide to print music, software, and web sites for musicians|year=2004|publisher=Scarecrow Press|location=Lanham, Md.|isbn=0810850273|edition=2.}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)