Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Single-bullet theory
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Origin== The first preliminary report on the assassination, issued by the [[FBI]] on December 9, 1963, said: "Three shots rang out. Two bullets struck President Kennedy, and one wounded Governor Connally."<ref>Warren Commission Document 1, [http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?absPageId=327202 p.1] Investigation of the Assassination of President Kennedy, December 9, 1963</ref> After the report was written, the FBI received the official autopsy report which indicated that the bullet that struck the president in the back had exited through his throat.<ref>{{cite news|newspaper=[[The New York Times]]|date=November 25, 1966|pages=1, 25|title=Prepared Statement of J. Edgar Hoover}}</ref> The FBI had written its report partly based on an initial autopsy report written by its agents<ref>"Autopsy of Body of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy," by Francis O'Neill Jr. and James W. Sibert</ref> which reflected the early presumption that that bullet had only penetrated several inches into the president's back and had likely fallen out. The FBI concluded, therefore, that the governor had been struck by a separate bullet.<ref>Bugliosi, p. 457.</ref> The [[Warren Commission]] commenced study of the [[Zapruder film]], the only known film to capture the entire assassination sequence, on January 27, 1964.<ref name="Bugliosi, p.454">Bugliosi, p.454.</ref> By then, the FBI had determined that the running speed of Abraham Zapruder's camera was 18.3 frames per second,<ref>Warren Commission Testimony, 5 H 153, Lyndal L. Shaneyfelt</ref> and that the [[John F. Kennedy assassination rifle|Carcano rifle]] found at the Texas School Book Depository, the presumed murder weapon, could not be accurately fired twice in under 2.3 seconds,<ref>Warren Report, p.115</ref> or 42 frames of the Zapruder film.<ref name="Bugliosi, p.454"/> When the Commission requested and received after February 25 higher-resolution images of the Zapruder film from ''[[Life (magazine)|Life]]'' magazine, who had purchased the film from Zapruder, it was immediately apparent that there was a timing problem with the FBI's conclusion that three bullets had found their mark.<ref>Bugliosi, p. 454.</ref> Kennedy was observed by the Commission to be waving to the crowd at frame 205 of the Zapruder film as he disappears behind the Stemmons Freeway sign, and seems to be reacting to a shot as he emerges from behind the sign a little more than a second later at frames 225 and 226. In their initial viewing of the film, Connally seemed to be reacting to being struck between frames 235 and 240.<ref>Warren Report, p. 106.</ref> Given the earliest possible frame at which Kennedy could have been struck (frame 205), and the minimum 42 frames (2.3 seconds) required between shots, there seemed to be insufficient time for separate bullets to be fired from the rifle. Several assistant counsels, upon viewing the film for the first time, concluded there had to be two assassins.<ref>Gest, Shapiro, Bowermaster, and Geier, ''JFK: The Untold Story of the Warren Commission'', p. 29.</ref> On April 14 and 21, two conferences were held at the Commission to determine when, exactly, the president and governor were struck. Assistant counsel Melvin Eisenberg wrote in a memorandum dated April 22 on the first conference that the consensus of those attending was, among other issues, that Kennedy was struck by frames 225β6 and that "the velocity of the first bullet [which struck Kennedy] would have been little diminished by its passage through the President. Therefore, if Governor Connally was in the path of the bullet it would have struck him and caused the wounds he sustained in his chest cavity... Strong indications that this occurred are provided by the facts that... if the first bullet did not strike Governor Connally, it should have ripped up the car but it apparently did not."<ref>Bugliosi, endnotes, pp. 304β305.</ref> However, the memorandum stated, given the relatively undamaged condition of the bullet presumed to have done this, CE 399, the consensus was a separate bullet probably struck his wrist and thigh. While not specifying a precise frame for when it was thought Connally was struck by the same bullet which struck Kennedy, the consensus was "by Z235" as afterwards his body position would not have allowed his back to be struck the way it was.<ref>Bugliosi, endnotes, pp. 304β305.</ref> By the end of April 1964, the Commission had its working theory, the single-bullet theory, to account for the apparent timing discrepancies found in the Zapruder film and the lack of any damage to the limousine from a high-velocity bullet exiting the president's throat.<ref>Bugliosi, endnotes, pp.306.</ref> Impact damage was observed in the limousine, but was indicative of lower-velocity bullets or bullet fragments. For example, a nick on the limousine's chrome was not from a high-velocity bullet as such a bullet would have pierced the chrome, not merely dented it.<ref>Bugliosi, endnotes, p. 300.</ref> On May 24, the FBI and [[United States Secret Service|Secret Service]] reenacted the shooting in [[Dallas]] and the Commission tested its theory.<ref>Bugliosi, p. 497.</ref> Agents acting as the president and the governor sat in a car of approximately the same dimensions of the presidential limousine, which was unavailable for the re-creation. Adjustments to measurements were made to account for the differences in the vehicles.<ref>Warren Commission Hearings, 5 H 148, Lyndal L. Shaneyfelt.</ref> Positions were recreated by matching them to particular frames of the Zapruder film, calibrated with other films and photographs taken that day. With the agents in position, photographs were taken from the sniper's nest of the [[Texas School Book Depository]].<ref>Bugliosi, p. 498.</ref> It was from this re-creation, and the testimony of the agent in the sniper's nest, that the Commission verified the theory to its satisfaction, as the governor was in a direct line to be struck by any bullet fired between frames 207 and 235 to 240<ref>Warren Report, pp. 97β98, 106β107, 110.</ref> which exited the president's throat. The agent testified that from frame 226 onward, the governor was "too much towards the front" and his wounds were therefore misaligned from that point.<ref>Warren Commission Hearings, 5 H 170β171, Robert A. Frazier</ref> An oak tree partially obscured the line of sight until frame 210, so the Commission concluded that "the President was not hit until at least frame 210 and that he was probably hit by frame 225".<ref>Warren Report, pp. 98, 105.</ref> Further evidence gathered suggested to the Commission that the initial April consensus that a separate bullet caused the governor's wrist and thigh injuries was incorrect, as the Army Wound [[Ballistics]] experts concluded that those wounds were "not caused by a pristine bullet," and therefore bullet CE 399 "could have caused all his wounds".<ref name="Warren Report, Appendix X">Warren Report, Appendix X.</ref> Other evidence, such as the nature of Connally's back wound (see below), was also cited by the Commission as corroborating the theory.<ref name="Warren Report, Appendix X"/> The Commission did not conclude the single-bullet theory had been proven, as three members of the body, Representative [[Hale Boggs]], Senators [[Richard Russell, Jr.|Richard Russell]] and [[John Sherman Cooper|John Cooper]] thought the theory improbable.<ref>This was confirmed by Cokie Roberts, daughter of Hale Boggs, in a personal interview with Richard Hayes Phillips on February 18, 1992, in Manchester, New Hampshire. The occasion was the victory celebration of Paul Tsongas in the New Hampshire Primary.</ref> Russell requested that his opposition to the theory be stated in a footnote in the report.<ref>Bugliosi, p. 455.</ref> In the end, the Commission changed the word "compelling" to "persuasive" and stated: "Although it is not necessary to any essential findings of the Commission to determine just which shot hit Governor Connally, there is very persuasive evidence to indicate that the same bullet which pierced the President's throat also caused Governor Connally's wounds."<ref name="Warren Report, p. 19">Warren Report, p. 19.</ref> Nevertheless, all seven members of the Commission signed off on the statement: "There was no question in the mind of any member of the Commission that all the shots which caused the President's and Governor Connally's wounds were fired from the sixth floor window of the [[Texas School Book Depository]]."<ref name="Warren Report, p. 19"/>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)