Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Social welfare function
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== {{Anchor|Construction|Construct|Constructing}}Terminology and equivalence == Some authors maintain a distinction between three closely-related concepts: # A social ''choice'' function selects a single best outcome (a single candidate who wins, or multiple if there happens to be a tie). # A social ''ordering'' function lists the candidates, from best to worst. # A social ''scoring'' function maps each candidate to a number representing their quality. For example, the standard social scoring function for [[first-preference plurality]] is the total number of voters who rank a candidate first. Every social ordering can be made into a choice function by considering only the highest-ranked outcome. Less obviously, though, every social choice function is also an ordering function. Deleting the best outcome, then finding the new winner, results in a runner-up who is assigned second place. Repeating this process gives a full ranking of all candidates.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Quesada |first=Antonio |date=2002 |title=From social choice functions to dictatorial social welfare functions |url=https://ideas.repec.org//a/ebl/ecbull/eb-02d70006.html |journal=Economics Bulletin |volume=4 |issue=16 |pages=1β7}}</ref> Because of this close relationship, the three kinds of functions are often conflated by [[abuse of terminology]]. === Example === Consider an [[Instant-runoff voting|instant-runoff]] election between Top, Center, and Bottom. Top has the most first-preference votes; Bottom has the second-most; and Center (positioned [[Political spectrum|between the two]]) has the fewest first preferences. {| class="wikitable" |+ ! !Round 1 !Round 2 |- !Top |40 |'''53''' |- !Center |<s>26</s> |''Eliminated'' |- !Bottom |34 |47 |} Under instant-runoff voting, Top is the winner. Center is eliminated in the first round, and their second-preferences are evenly split between Top and Bottom, allowing Top to win. To find the second-place finisher, we find the winner if Top had not run. In this case, the election is between Center and Bottom. {| class="wikitable" !Runner-up !Round 1 |- !β |''Excluded'' |- !Center |'''66''' |- !Bottom |34 |} (Note that the finishing order is not the same as the elimination order for [[Sequential elimination method|sequential elimination methods]]: despite being eliminated first, Center is the runner-up in this election.)
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)