Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Sound change
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Principles== The following statements are used as heuristics in formulating sound changes as understood within the [[Neogrammarian]] model. However, for modern linguistics, they are not taken as inviolable rules but are seen as guidelines. '''Sound change has no memory''': Sound change does not discriminate between the sources of a sound. If a previous sound change causes X,Y > Y (features X and Y merge as Y), a new one cannot affect only an original X. '''Sound change ignores grammar''': A sound change can have only phonological constraints, like X > Z in [[stress (linguistics)|unstressed]] [[syllables]]. For example, it cannot affect only [[adjective]]s. The only exception is that a sound change may recognise word boundaries, even when they are unindicated by [[prosody (linguistics)|prosodic]] clues. Also, sound changes may be [[regularization (linguistics)|regularized]] in [[inflectional paradigm|inflectional paradigms]] (such as verbal inflection), when it is no longer [[phonology|phonological]] but [[morphology (linguistics)|morphological]] in nature.<ref>See Hill, Nathan W. (2014) '[http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/18595/ Grammatically conditioned sound change].' ''Language and Linguistics Compass,'' 8 (6). pp. 211-229.</ref> '''Sound change is exceptionless''': If a sound change can happen at a place, it will affect all sounds that meet the criteria for change. Apparent exceptions are possible because of [[analogy]] and other regularization processes, another sound change, or an unrecognized conditioning factor. That is the traditional view expressed by the Neogrammarians. In the past decades, however, it has been shown{{by whom?|date=May 2024}} that sound change does not necessarily affect all possible words.{{Citation needed|date=July 2021}} However, when a sound change is initiated, it often eventually expands to the whole [[lexicon]]. For example, the [[Spanish language|Spanish]] fronting of the [[Vulgar Latin]] [g] ([[voiced velar stop]]) before [i e Ι] seems to have reached every possible word. By contrast, the voicing of word-initial Latin [k] to [g] occurred in ''colaphus'' > ''golpe'' and ''cattus'' > ''gato'' but not in ''canna'' > ''caΓ±a''. See also [[lexical diffusion]]. '''Sound change is inevitable''': All languages vary from place to place and time to time, and neither writing nor media prevents that change.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)