Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Strict conditional
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Avoiding paradoxes== The strict conditionals may avoid [[paradoxes of material implication]]. The following statement, for example, is not correctly formalized by material implication: : If Bill Gates graduated in medicine, then Elvis never died. This condition should clearly be false: the degree of Bill Gates has nothing to do with whether Elvis is still alive. However, the direct encoding of this formula in [[classical logic]] using material implication leads to: : Bill Gates graduated in medicine β Elvis never died. This formula is true because whenever the antecedent ''A'' is false, a formula ''A'' β ''B'' is true. Hence, this formula is not an adequate translation of the original sentence. An encoding using the strict conditional is: : <math>\Box</math> (Bill Gates graduated in medicine β Elvis never died). In modal logic, this formula means (roughly) that, in every possible world in which Bill Gates graduated in medicine, Elvis never died. Since one can easily imagine a world where Bill Gates is a medicine graduate and Elvis is dead, this formula is false. Hence, this formula seems to be a correct translation of the original sentence.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)