Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Swiftsure-class submarine
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Design history== The {{HMS|Dreadnought|S101|2}}, {{sclass|Valiant|submarine|5}} and {{sclass|Churchill|submarine|5}} classes all had a [[Teardrop hull|"whale-shaped hull"]], of "near-perfect streamlining giving maximum underwater efficiency". The hulls were of British design, "based on the pioneering work of the [[US Navy]] in {{sclass|Skipjack|submarine|5}} and {{USS|Albacore|AGSS-569|2}}."<ref>Blackman, Raymond VB, ''Jane's Fighting Ships, 1966β67'', pub Sampson Low Marston & Co Ltd, 1966, p. 279.</ref> The hull of the ''Swiftsure'' class was a different shape and maintained its diameter for a much greater length than previous classes.<ref name=Janes1982p546Cost/> Compared with the ''Valiant''s the ''Swiftsure''s were {{convert|13|ft|m|abbr=on}}<ref name=Hoolp184>Hool, Jack, and Nutter, Keith, ''Damned Un-English Machines, a history of Barrow-built submarines'', pub Tempus, 2003, {{ISBN|0-7524-2781-4}} pages 181β4.</ref> "shorter with a fuller form, with the fore-planes set further forward, with one less torpedo tube and with a deeper diving depth."<ref name=Janes1982p546Cost/> A second major change was in propulsion. Rather than the seven/nine-bladed [[propeller]] used by the previous classes, all but the first of the ''Swiftsure''-class submarines used a shrouded pump-jet propulsor.<ref name=Hoolp184/> The prototype propulsor had powered {{HMS|Churchill|S46|2}}.<ref>Hool, Jack, and Nutter, Keith, ''Damned Un-English Machines, a history of Barrow-built submarines'', pub Tempus, 2003, {{ISBN|0-7524-2781-4}} page 180.</ref> It is not clear why {{HMS|Swiftsure|S126|2}} was the only one of the class not fitted with a propulsor.<ref name=Hoolp184/> The propulsor was perhaps as much as 50% more efficient than a propeller, producing the same speed at lower revolutions, thus reducing the noise signature. In addition all pipework connections to equipment on the main machinery raft had expansion/flexible coupling connections, which also reduced noise. The US Navy secured a licence to copy the main shaft flexible coupling arrangement in US-built submarines.<ref name=Hoolp184/>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)