Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Tensor product of fields
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Compositum of fields== First, one defines the notion of the compositum of fields. This construction occurs frequently in [[field theory (mathematics)|field theory]]. The idea behind the compositum is to make the smallest field containing two other fields. In order to formally define the compositum, one must first specify a [[tower of fields]]. Let ''k'' be a field and ''L'' and ''K'' be two extensions of ''k''. The compositum, denoted ''K.L'', is defined to be <math> K.L = k(K \cup L) </math> where the right-hand side denotes the extension generated by ''K'' and ''L''. This assumes ''some'' field containing both ''K'' and ''L''. Either one starts in a situation where an ambient field is easy to identify (for example if ''K'' and ''L'' are both subfields of the [[complex number]]s), or one proves a result that allows one to place both ''K'' and ''L'' (as [[isomorphic]] copies) in some large enough field. In many cases one can identify ''K''.''L'' as a [[vector space]] [[tensor product]], taken over the field ''N'' that is the intersection of ''K'' and ''L''. For example, if one adjoins β2 to the [[rational numbers|rational field]] <math>\mathbb{Q}</math> to get ''K'', and β3 to get ''L'', it is true that the field ''M'' obtained as ''K''.''L'' inside the complex numbers <math>\mathbb{C}</math> is ([[up to]] isomorphism) :<math>K\otimes_{\mathbb Q}L</math> as a vector space over <math>\mathbb{Q}</math>. (This type of result can be verified, in general, by using the [[ramification (mathematics)|ramification]] theory of [[algebraic number theory]].) Subfields ''K'' and ''L'' of ''M'' are [[linearly disjoint]] (over a subfield ''N'') when in this way the natural ''N''-linear map of :<math>K\otimes_NL</math> to ''K''.''L'' is [[injective]].<ref>{{springer|id=L/l059560|title=Linearly-disjoint extensions}}</ref> Naturally enough this isn't always the case, for example when ''K'' = ''L''. When the degrees are finite, injectivity is equivalent here to [[bijectivity]]. Hence, when ''K'' and ''L'' are linearly disjoint finite-degree extension fields over ''N'', <math>K.L \cong K \otimes_N L</math>, as with the aforementioned extensions of the rationals. A significant case in the theory of [[cyclotomic field]]s is that for the ''n''th [[roots of unity]], for ''n'' a [[composite number]], the subfields generated by the ''p''<sup>''k''</sup>th roots of unity for [[prime power]]s dividing ''n'' are linearly disjoint for distinct ''p''.<ref>{{springer|id=c/c027570|title=Cyclotomic field}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)