Editing Thermal design power (section)

== Calculation ==
{{See also|CPU power dissipation}}
{| class="wikitable floatright"
|+ ACP compared to TDP<ref>John Fruehe. [http://www.amdzone.com/phpbb3/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=136664&p=164919#p164919 "Istanbul EE launches today"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110728150811/http://www.amdzone.com/phpbb3/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=136664&p=164919#p164919 |date=2011-07-28 }}</ref>
|-
! style="min-width: 5em;" | ACP
! style="min-width: 5em;" | TDP
|-
| 40&nbsp;W || 60&nbsp;W
|-
| 55&nbsp;W || 79&nbsp;W
|-
| 75&nbsp;W || 115&nbsp;W
|-
| 105&nbsp;W || 137&nbsp;W
|}

The ''average CPU power'' (ACP) is the power consumption of [[central processing unit]]s, especially [[server computer|server]] processors, under "average" daily usage as defined by [[Advanced Micro Devices]] (AMD) for use in its line of processors based on the [[AMD K10|K10]] microarchitecture ([[Opteron#Micro-architecture update|Opteron 8300 and 2300 series]] processors). Intel's thermal design power (TDP), used for Pentium and Core 2 processors, measures the energy consumption under high workload; it is numerically somewhat higher than the "average" ACP rating of the same processor.

According to AMD the ACP rating includes the power consumption when running several benchmarks, including [[TPC-C]], [[SPEC#Current|SPECcpu2006]], [[SPEC#Current|SPECjbb2005]] and STREAM Benchmark<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.cs.virginia.edu/stream/|title=Memory bandwidth: Stream benchmark performance results |work=virginia.edu}}</ref> (memory bandwidth),<ref>{{Cite web |title=AMD's Quad-Core Barcelona: Defending New Territory |last=de Gelas |first=Johan|website=AnandTech |date=10 September 2007 |url= https://www.anandtech.com/show/2322/2}}</ref>
<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.dailytech.com/AMD+Unveils+Barcelona+Architecture/article6299.htm|date=7 September 2007|archive-url=
https://web.archive.org/web/20071027183549/http://www.dailytech.com/AMD+Unveils+Barcelona+Architecture/article6299.htm|archive-date=27 October 2007|title=AMD Unveils "Barcelona" Architecture|last1=Huynh|first1=Anh T.|last2=Kubicki|first2=Kristopher |website=DailyTech}}</ref><ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20171218005536/http://images.dailytech.com/nimage/5925_large_amd_explains_acp.png DailyTech - Introducing Average CPU Power], September 2007</ref> which AMD said is an appropriate method of power consumption measurement for [[data center]]s and server-intensive workload environments. AMD said that the ACP and TDP values of the processors will both be stated and do not replace one another. ''Barcelona'' and later server processors have the two power figures.

The TDP of a CPU has been underestimated in some cases, leading to certain real applications (typically strenuous, such as video encoding or games) causing the CPU to exceed its specified TDP and resulting in overloading the computer's cooling system. In this case, CPUs either cause a system failure (a "therm-trip") or throttle their speed down.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://ixbtlabs.com/articles2/p4-throttling/ | title = Testing Thermal Throttling in Pentium 4 CPUs with Northwood and Prescott cores | date = 2004-03-26 | access-date = 2013-12-21 | author = Stanislav Garmatyuk | website = ixbtlabs.com }}</ref> Most modern processors will cause a therm-trip only upon a catastrophic cooling failure, such as a no longer operational fan or an incorrectly mounted heat sink.

For example, a [[laptop]]'s CPU cooling system may be designed for a 20&nbsp;[[Watt|W]] TDP, which means that it can dissipate up to 20&nbsp;watts of heat without exceeding the maximum [[junction temperature]] for the laptop's CPU. A cooling system can do this using an active cooling method (e.g. conduction coupled with forced convection) such as a [[heat sink]] with a [[Computer fan|fan]], or any of the two passive cooling methods: [[thermal radiation]] or [[Conduction (heat)|conduction]]. Typically, a combination of these methods is used.

Since safety margins and the definition of what constitutes a real application vary among manufacturers, TDP values between different manufacturers cannot be accurately compared (a processor with a TDP of, for example, 100&nbsp;W will almost certainly use more power at full load than processors with a fraction of said TDP, and very probably more than processors with lower TDP from the same manufacturer, but it may or may not use more power than a processor from a different manufacturer with a not excessively lower TDP, such as 90&nbsp;W). Additionally, TDPs are often specified for families of processors, with the low-end models usually using significantly less power than those at the high end of the family.

Until around 2006 [[AMD]] used to report the maximum power draw of its processors as TDP. [[Intel]] changed this practice with the introduction of its [[Conroe (microprocessor)|Conroe]] family of processors.<ref>{{cite web | last = Ou | first = George | url = https://www.zdnet.com/article/who-to-believe-on-power-consumption-amd-or-intel/ | title = Who to believe on power consumption? AMD or Intel? | publisher = ZDNet | date = 2006-07-17 | access-date = 2014-02-11 }}</ref> Intel calculates a specified chip's TDP according to the amount of power the computer's fan and heatsink need to be able to dissipate while the chip is under sustained load. Actual power usage can be higher or (much) lower than TDP, but the figure is intended to give guidance to engineers designing cooling solutions for their products.<ref>{{ cite web | url = https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2013/01/the-technical-details-behind-intels-7-watt-ivy-bridge-cpus/ | title = The technical details behind Intel's 7 Watt Ivy Bridge CPUs | date = 2013-01-14 | access-date = 2013-01-14 | publisher = arstechnica.com }}</ref> In particular, Intel's measurement also does not fully take into account [[Intel Turbo Boost]] due to the default time limits, while AMD does because [[AMD Turbo Core]] always tries to push for the maximum power.<ref>{{cite web |author1=Linus Tech Tips |title=Who REALLY Runs Hotter? AMD (3800X) vs Intel (i9-9900K) |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6u4ew6IT4Vo |website=YouTube |date=Sep 16, 2019 }}</ref>