Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Through arch bridge
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Function == For a specific construction method, especially for [[masonry]] arches, the proportions of the arch remain similar no matter what the size: wider arches are thus required to be taller arches.<ref name="Gordon, Through arch">{{Cite book |last=Gordon |first=J.E. |title=Structures |publisher=Penguin |year=1991 |isbn=978-0-14-013628-9 |pages=200β201, 203 |ref={{harvid|Gordon|Structures}} |orig-year=1978}}</ref> For a [[semi-circular arch]], the height is half of the span. Bridges across deep, narrow gorges can have their arch placed entirely beneath a flat roadway, but bridges in flatter country rise above their road approaches. A wide bridge may require an arch so tall as to become a significant obstacle and incline for the roadway. Small bridges can be [[humpback bridge|hump-backed]], but larger bridges such as the [[Old Bridge, Pontypridd]] may become so steep as to require steps, making their use for wheeled traffic difficult. Railways also find arched bridges difficult as they are even less tolerant of inclines. Where simple arched bridges are used for railways on flat terrain the cost of building long approach embankments may be considerable. Further issues are the [[foundation (engineering)|foundations]] for the bridge. Arch bridges generate large side thrusts on their footings and so may require a solid bedrock foundation. Flattening the arch shape to avoid the humpback problem, such as for [[Maidenhead Railway Bridge|Brunel's Maidenhead bridge]], increases this side thrust. It is often impossible to achieve a flat enough arch, simply owing to the limitations of the foundations – particularly in flat country.<ref name="Gordon, Through arch" /> Historically, such bridges often became [[viaduct]]s of multiple small arches. With the availability of iron or concrete as structural materials, it became possible to construct a ''through arch bridge'': a bridge where the deck does not have to be carried over the top of the arch.<ref name="Gordon, Through arch" /> This requires a structure that can both support the deck from the arch by tension rods, chains or cables and allow a gap in the arch, so the deck can pass through it. The first of these in particular cannot be achieved with masonry construction and requires [[wrought iron]] or steel. The use of a through arch does not change the proportions or size of the arch: a large span will still require a tall arch, although this can now reach any height above the deck without obstructing traffic. The arch may also reach downwards at its sides, to either reach strong foundations or to place the roadway at a convenient height for spanning a deep valley from a plateau above. The [[Tyne Bridge]] demonstrates both of these advantages.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)