Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Total order
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Strict and non-strict total orders== For delimitation purposes, a total order as defined [[#Top|above]] is sometimes called ''non-strict'' order. For each (non-strict) total order <math>\leq</math> there is an associated relation <math><</math>, called the ''strict total order'' associated with <math>\leq</math> that can be defined in two equivalent ways: * <math>a < b</math> if <math>a \leq b</math> and <math>a \neq b</math> ([[reflexive reduction]]). * <math>a < b</math> if not <math>b \leq a</math> (i.e., <math><</math> is the [[Binary relation#Complement|complement]] of the [[converse relation|converse]] of <math>\leq</math>). Conversely, the [[reflexive closure]] of a strict total order <math><</math> is a (non-strict) total order. Thus, a '''{{em|strict total order}}''' on a set <math>X</math> is a [[strict partial order]] on <math>X</math> in which any two distinct elements are comparable. That is, a strict total order is a [[binary relation]] <math><</math> on some [[Set (mathematics)|set]] <math>X</math>, which satisfies the following for all <math>a, b</math> and <math>c</math> in <math>X</math>: # Not <math>a < a</math> ([[Irreflexive relation|irreflexive]]). # If <math>a < b</math> then not <math> b < a </math> ([[asymmetric relation|asymmetric]]). # If <math>a < b</math> and <math>b < c</math> then <math>a < c</math> ([[Transitive relation|transitive]]). # If <math>a \neq b</math>, then <math>a < b</math> or <math>b < a</math> ([[Connected relation|connected]]). Asymmetry follows from transitivity and irreflexivity;<ref>Let <math>a < b</math>, assume for contradiction that also <math> b < a </math>. Then <math>a < a</math> by transitivity, which contradicts irreflexivity.</ref> moreover, irreflexivity follows from asymmetry.<ref>If <math>a < a</math>, the not <math>a < a</math> by asymmetry.</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)