Editing Triplane (section)

==Design principles==
[[Image:triplane.svg|211px|right|thumb|Front view of a triplane]]
The triplane arrangement may be compared with the [[biplane]] in a number of ways.

A triplane arrangement has a narrower wing [[Chord (aircraft)|chord]] than a biplane of similar span and area. This gives each wing-plane a slender appearance with higher [[aspect ratio]], making it more efficient and giving increased lift. This potentially offers a faster rate of climb and tighter turning radius, both of which are important in a fighter. The [[Sopwith Triplane]] was a successful example, having the same wing span as the equivalent biplane, the [[Sopwith Pup]].

Alternatively, a triplane has reduced span compared to a biplane of given wing area and aspect ratio, leading to a more compact and lightweight structure. This potentially offers better maneuverability for a fighter, and higher load-capacity with more practical ground handling for a large aircraft type.

The famous [[Fokker Dr.I]] triplane offered a balance between the two approaches, having moderately shorter span and moderately higher aspect ratio than the equivalent biplane, the [[Fokker D.VI]].

Yet a third comparison may be made between a biplane and triplane having the same wing plan: the triplane's third wing provides increased wing area, giving much-increased lift. The extra weight is partially offset by the increased depth of the overall structure, allowing a more efficient construction. The [[Caproni Ca.4]] and [[Levy-Besson]] families of large, multi-engined triplanes both had some success with this approach.

[[File:Caproni Ca.60 modeli in Volandia Museum.jpg|thumb|right|175px|A scale model of a [[Caproni Ca.60]] flying boat.]]

These advantages are offset to a greater or lesser extent in any given design by the extra weight and drag of the structural bracing and by the loss of lift resulting from aerodynamic interference between the wings in any stacked configuration. The multiplane idea was taken a step further by the [[quadruplane]]. No examples were successful, and as biplane design advanced, it became clear that the disadvantages of the triplane and quadruplane outweighed their advantages.

In a practical landplane design, the lower set of wings are typically set approximately level with the underside of the aircraft's [[fuselage]], the middle set level with the top of the fuselage, and the top set supported above the fuselage on [[cabane strut]]s. In a practical [[flying boat]], even the lowest wing must be placed well above the waterline of the hull, creating a tall structure overall.