Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Turing reduction
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Definition == Given two sets <math>A,B \subseteq \mathbb{N}</math> of natural numbers, we say <math>A</math> is '''Turing reducible''' to <math>B</math> and write :<math>A \leq_T B</math> [[if and only if]] there is an [[oracle machine]] that computes the [[Indicator function|characteristic function]] of ''A'' when run with oracle ''B''. In this case, we also say ''A'' is '''''B''-recursive''' and '''''B''-computable'''. If there is an oracle machine that, when run with oracle ''B'', computes a [[partial function]] with domain ''A'', then ''A'' is said to be '''''B''-[[recursively enumerable set|recursively enumerable]]''' and '''''B''-computably enumerable'''. We say <math>A</math> is '''Turing equivalent''' to <math>B</math> and write <math>A \equiv_T B\,</math> if both <math>A \leq_T B</math> and <math>B \leq_T A.</math> The [[equivalence class]]es of Turing equivalent sets are called '''[[Turing degree]]s'''. The Turing degree of a set <math>X</math> is written <math>\textbf{deg}(X)</math>. Given a set <math>\mathcal{X} \subseteq \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{N})</math>, a set <math>A \subseteq \mathbb{N}</math> is called '''Turing hard''' for <math>\mathcal{X}</math> if <math>X \leq_T A</math> for all <math>X \in \mathcal{X}</math>. If additionally <math>A \in \mathcal{X}</math> then <math>A</math> is called '''Turing complete''' for <math>\mathcal{X}</math>. ===Relation of Turing completeness to computational universality=== Turing completeness, as just defined above, corresponds only partially to [[Turing completeness]] in the sense of computational universality. Specifically, a Turing machine is a [[universal Turing machine]] if its [[halting problem]] (i.e., the set of inputs for which it eventually halts) is [[Many-one reduction|many-one complete]] for the set <math>\mathcal{X}</math> of recursively enumerable sets. Thus, a necessary ''but insufficient'' condition for a machine to be computationally universal, is that the machine's halting problem be Turing-complete for <math>\mathcal{X}</math>. Insufficient because it may still be the case that, the language accepted by the machine is not itself recursively enumerable.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)