Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Argument from poor design
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==As an argument regarding God== The argument from poor design is sometimes interpreted, by the argumenter or the listener, as an [[argument against the existence of God]], or against characteristics commonly attributed to a [[creator deity]], such as [[omnipotence]], [[omniscience]], or personality. In a weaker form, it is used as an argument for the incompetence of God. The existence of "poor design" (as well as the perceived prodigious "wastefulness" of the evolutionary process) would seem to imply a "poor" designer, or a "blind" designer, or no designer at all. In Gould's words, "If God had designed a beautiful machine to reflect his wisdom and power, surely he would not have used a collection of parts generally fashioned for other purposes. Orchids are not made by an ideal engineer; they are jury-rigged...."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.stephenjaygould.org/library/gould_panda%27s-thumb.html |title=The Panda's Peculiar Thumb |work=NATURAL HISTORY |date=November 1978 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060928063454/http://www.stephenjaygould.org/library/gould_panda's-thumb.html |archive-date=2006-09-28 }}</ref> The apparently suboptimal design of organisms has also been used by proponents of [[theistic evolution]] to argue in favour of a creator deity who uses [[natural selection]] as a mechanism of his creation.<ref>[[Francis Collins|Collins, Francis S.]] ''The Language of God'' (New York: Simon & Schuster), 2006. p 191. {{ISBN|978-1-4165-4274-2}}</ref> Arguers from poor design regard counter-arguments as a [[false dilemma]], imposing that either a creator deity designed life on earth well or flaws in design indicate the life is not designed. This allows proponents of [[intelligent design]] to [[Cherry picking (fallacy)|cherry pick]] which aspects of life constitute design, leading to the [[unfalsifiability]] of the theory. Christian proponents of both intelligent design and creationism may claim that good design indicates the creative intelligence of their God, while poor design indicates corruption of the world as a result of [[Alvin Plantinga's free will defense|free will]] that caused the [[fall of man]] (for example, in [[Book of Genesis|Genesis]] 3:16 [[Yahweh]] says to [[Eve]] "I will increase your trouble in pregnancy").<ref>{{cite web |url=https://answersingenesis.org/human-evolution/the-evolution-of-childbirth/ |title=The Evolution of Childbirth? |last=Mitchell |first=Dr. Elizabeth |date=15 November 2006 |website=Answers in Genesis |access-date=11 December 2020}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)