Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Base Realignment and Closure
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===2015=== The 2005 Commission recommended that Congress authorize another BRAC round in 2015 and every eight years thereafter.<ref>[http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0905/090905cdam1.htm BRAC panel calls closure round premature - News] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081202171348/http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0905/090905cdam1.htm |date=December 2, 2008 }}. GovExec.com. Retrieved on 2013-07-21.</ref> On May 10, 2012, the [[United States House Committee on Armed Services|House Armed Services Committee]] rejected calls by the Pentagon for base closures outside of a 2015 round by a 44 to 18 vote.<ref>[http://www.military.com/news/article/house-committee-rejects-more-base-closings.html?ESRC=sm_todayinmil.nl Military Headlines]. Military.com. Retrieved on 2013-07-21.</ref> Defense Secretary [[Leon Panetta]] had called for two rounds of base closures while at the same time arguing that the alternative of the sequester would be a "meat-ax" approach to cuts which would "hollow out" military forces.<ref>[http://www.nola.com/military/index.ssf/2012/05/us_house_committee_rejects_mor.html U.S. House committee rejects more military base closings]. NOLA.com. Retrieved on 2013-07-21.</ref> The [[National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014]] specifically prohibits authorization of future BRAC rounds.<ref>{{USPL|113|66}}: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Sec. 2711; page 334; {{USStat|127|1004}})</ref> In May 2014, it was attempted to fund another round of BRAC, although funding was not approved in a vote in May of that year.<ref name=Jordan>{{cite news|last=Jordan|first=Bryant|title=House Panel Protects A-10, Pulls BRAC from Budget|url=http://www.military.com/daily-news/2014/05/07/house-panel-protects-a10-pulls-brac-from-budget.html|access-date=8 May 2014|newspaper=Military.com|date=7 May 2014}}</ref> In March 2015, the Acting Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, Installations, and Environment addressed the possibility of a future BRAC, indicating that the DOD, Defense Secretary [[Ash Carter]] was requesting authority to conduct another BRAC.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Marshall, Jr.|first1=Tyrone|title=Senior DoD Official Testifies on Budget, BRAC|url=https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/id/128294/|website=U.S. Department of Defense|access-date=22 April 2015}}</ref> In September 2015, at the tenth anniversary of the end of the most recent BRAC commission report, its former chairman [[Anthony Principi]] wrote, "Now is the time to do what's right for our men and women in uniform. Spending dollars on infrastructure that does not serve their needs is inexcusable."<ref>{{cite news|author1=Anthony J. Principi|title=Time for a new BRAC|url=https://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/homeland-security/252594-time-for-a-new-brac/|access-date=5 September 2015|work=The Hill|publisher=Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc|date=3 September 2015}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)